๐ŸŽฅ Interview ๐Ÿ”ด Donetsk Nuclear Attack โšซ๏ธ

Castle Bravo schrunch


Leuren Moret: Jesuit-Controlled Obama, US, Authorizes Nuclear Attack On Donetsk (Ukraine)

Leuren Moret Interviewed by Alfred Lambremont Webre,ย Published April 3, 2015

VANCOUVER, BC โ€“ย ย Independent scientist Leuren Moret, BS, MA, PhD ABD, in a wide-rangingย interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, documents in depth how Jesuit-controlled US President Barack Obama and the United Statesย  military intervenors in the Ukraine authorized and directed the Ukrainian government to carry out a nuclear weapons attack on Donetsk in the Ukraine.

VIDEO ON YOUTUBE:ย https://youtu.be/YbmUfWEGp4Aย 

Castle Bravo schrunch


_TITLE PLATE- Donetsk Nuclear Explosion
Image #1_ Donetsk Detonation

FIG. 1: NUCLEAR BALLISTIC MISSILE ATTACK ON DONETSK. On Sunday February 8, 2015, at 10:50 PM local time, an unprecedented nuclear attack by Ukrainian government troops occurred in the city of Donetsk. The TOCHKA-U (SS-21 SCARAB) Soviet-era short range ballistic missile, armed with an AA-60 nuclear warhead with a selectable yield of 10-100 kt, was one of 50 TOCHKA-U missiles left in the Ukraine military arsenal after the collapse of the Soviet Union. For comparison the Hiroshima bomb had a yield of 20 kt, the first nuclear bomb to be dropped on a human population in Japan in 1945.ย [see FIG. 22] ย Source: J. Phillips, โ€Did a tactical nuke just go off in Ukraine, big explosion rocks Donetskโ€, Epoch Times, Feb. 8, 2015. http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1243441-did-a-tactical-nuke-just-go-off-in-ukraine-big-explosion-rocks-donetsk/

TOCHKA-U BALLISTIC MISSILE ATTACK ON CITY OF DONETSK: ย The TOCHKA-U ballistic missile was armed with a nuclear warhead, that detonated in a partially wooded industrial area,ย 1000 meters (0.6 mile) from the Donetsk State Factory of Chemical Products, in the Donetsk district of Kuibishevsky [FIG. 2(a)]. The nuclear blast left a crater 9.1 meter (30โ€™) deep and 50 meters (164โ€™) wide [FIG. 2(b)]. Trees surrounding the crater were stripped of leaves and snapped off like matchsticks from the powerful blast [FIG. 2(b), 21]. The high-energy shock wave shattered windows all over Donetsk, and was felt 30 km (18.6 miles) away.

FIG. 2(a): POWERFUL NUCLEAR MISSILE BLAST IN LARGEST CITY IN DONBASS. City of Donetsk map, with location of TOCHKA-U short-range ballistic missile blast, near a chemical plant in Kuibyshevsky District west of Donetsk. The nuclear blast occurred near midnight on February 8, 2015, in a wooded area. The explosion and shock wave broke glass windows and shook buildings all over Donetsk. Source: โ€œThe war in Novorossia Online 02.08.2015 Chronicleโ€, Feb. 2, 2015. http://en.voicesevas.ru/news/yugo-vostok/3484-the-war-in-novorossia-online-02082015-chronicle.html

Image #2b (left) Missile crater conventional warhead 20141022 Pic 1.|(right) Missile crater nuclear warhead 20150209 Pic 4. [in crater looking up from cam location] - (for comparison w- Donetsk Nuke crater) Novorossiya News #15

FIG. 2(b): TWO DONETSK TOCHKA-U WARHEADS: SAME ROCKET DIFFERENT PACKAGE: The TOCHKA-U short-range Soviet era missile can be armed with a conventional warhead (crater on left), nuclear warhead (crater on right), or biological warhead. The width of the nuclear crater is about 5 times wider than for conventional warhead, and depth of crater from a nuclear warhead is about twice as deep. The lips of the craters are about 0.6m (2โ€™) for conventional warhead compared to 3m (10โ€™) high nuclear warhead or five times higher than for a conventional warhead. ย Source: (L) [eng subs] โ€œGraham Phillips visited Tochka U strike scene (launch Oct. 18, 2014)โ€, G. Phillips, Jan. 26, 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgvfA2jOGvo; (R) โ€œTochka-U Missile Attackโ€, Channel 24 (RU), Feb. 9, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C8GV63mnBU ย http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.com/2014/10/donetsk-hit-by-tochka-u.htmlย 

GERMAN INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATES 50,000 CASUALTIES IN 2014: ย A volunteer militia of ethnic Russian separatists, in the Donbass and Lugansk former oblasts (regions) have been fiercely fighting against the Ukrainian government forces, controlled by the illegal Kiev Junta, that overthrew democratically elected President Yanukovich one year ago.

VIDEO: LifeNews video: Graveyard on the Debaltsevo-Artemovsk highway.ย Feb. 16, 2015: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=58b_1424079783ย ย [08:46]

[English transcript: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=58b_1424079783 ]

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=58b_1424079783#zSF7td1OoscBwvys.99ย 

VIDEO: LifeNews video: โ€œDeath on the Debaltsevo-Artemovsk highwayโ€ ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย ย Feb. 15, 2015: http://lifenews.ru/news/149938ย  [05:55]

[English transcript: http://fortruss.blogspot.no/2015/02/lifenews-video-graveyard-on-debaltsevo.html]

Image #3 MAP War zone Novorussia 02_08_15

FIG. 3: WAR ZONE OF NOVORUSSIA FEBRUARY 8, 2015. The Novorussia separatist region of conflict is indicated by darker red on the eastern Ukraine border with Russia. Dark red spots are cities, surrounded by villages heavily attacked by Ukrainian govt. troops. Lighter red indicates spreading local partisan activities, and increasing separatist movements throughout Ukraine. Approximately 8000 Ukrainian government troops, surrounded by militia, were trapped in the Debaltsevo caldron (dark gray area in center of conflict) since late January, unable to escape with supplies dwindling. Growing partisan resistance across Ukraine separated the Ukraine govt. troop zone from north to south at the northern border with Russia from Kharkov south to the Sea of Azov, trapping them in the area between there and the eastern border with Russia. The surprise encirclement of the govt. troops by the militia in the Debaltsevo cauldron created a state of panic in the pro-govt. troops, Kiev Junta, and U.S. government elites behind the civil war in Ukraine set up by Dick Cheney during the Cold War. ย Source: โ€œThe war in Novorossia Online 02.08.2015 Chronicleโ€, Feb. 2, 2015. ย http://en.voicesevas.ru/news/yugo-vostok/3484-the-war-in-novorossia-online-02082015-chronicle.htmlย 

Located in the eastern region of Ukraine bordering Russia, the Feb. 8, 2015, short-range ballistic nuclear missile attack on Donetsk, an ethnic Russian city, occurred in a war zone where German Intelligence recently estimated that 50,000 people have died in the past year (civilians, Ukraine govt. troops, mercenaries and Nazi gangs, and separatist volunteer militia). That is five times higher than the Kiev Junta and western media has been reporting for the entire year.

The German Intel information is an underestimate if the death rate of just one city, Ilovaisk, in August 2014, is considered; and the number of pro-Government soldiers who have died at Debaltsevo in February 2015. Two thirds of the 16,000 civilians living in the city of Ilovasik, were killed by the Ukrainian govt. troops in one battle with the militia, that lasted 3 weeks in Aug. 2014. At Debaltsevo cauldron in February 2015, at least 6500 pro-Government soldiers were killed. Additionally, President Poroshenko himself announced in late July 2014 that 15,000 soldiers had just โ€œdisappearedโ€ and it was โ€œunknownโ€ what happened to them. It was discovered later by the militia that the Ukrainian army was throwing the bodies of their own dead soldiers into lakes in the war zone at night. The actual death rate for the past year could easily be double the 50,000 estimate.

PRIOR MISSILE ATTACKS ON A CHEMICAL PLANT:

Image #4 Missile attack chemical factory

FIG. 4: October 20, 2014, MISSILE ATTACK ON DONETSK CHEMICAL PLANT BY PRO-GOVERNMENT TROOPS.ย Fires and explosions of old munitions caused release of toxic chemicals into the atmosphere in the industrial area of the city of Donetsk, exposing the civilian population and soldiers downwind to unknown chemicals and radiation. Color changes in the smoke plume indicate different chemicals burning, mixing, interacting, and causing synergistic effects that multiply the toxicity of exposure to biological systems. When combined with the depleted uranium dust in the region, the synergistic effects are multiplied by combining complex chemical and radioactive materials.ย ย Source: YouTube โ€“ โ€œUkraine: Huge mushroom cloud over Donetsk as explosion rattles cityโ€, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1UdukqLrnkย 

Pro-government troops (Ukraine government troops and National Guard), are embedded with foreign mercenaries, Mossad, oligarch-hired thugs, Georgian and Chechen criminal gangs, extreme right fascist/Nazi Nationalists, US/EU/NATO advisors and โ€œvolunteersโ€, Blackwater and other US military personnel, and foreign mercenaries. The chemical plant had been attacked by Ukrainian govt. troops several times, on September 20, October 20 [FIG. 4], and in November 2014, with conventional weapons, causing large explosions and fires. Ukraine government troops deliberately exposed the separatist civilian population and volunteer militia to prolonged fires and releases of very large plumes of toxic chemicals, military explosives including depleted uranium, and other unknown chemical poisons.

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ

RELIGIOUS WAR AGAINST ETHNIC RUSSIAN EASTERN ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS: Attacking civilian infrastructure in a heavily populated city with a short-range nuclear armed ballistic missile (AA-60 warhead has a 10-100 kt yield), is a war crime foreshadowing future wars in weaker countries that will be fought illegally with nuclear weapons, causing nuclear pollution and genocide of the population. This form of nuclear extermination, was planned and blatantly announced by the Kiev Junta as their genocide agenda for Russian speaking citizens in Ukraine over two years ago.ย 

JPEG % Ukrainian speaking 2001 census

Percentage Of People With Ukrainian As Their Native Language.

Source:ย Alex Tora - Data from Ukranianย censusย 2001, from "Population of those whose mother language is Ukrainian in Ukraine (2001)โ€ ย http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_language#/media/File:Ukraine_census_2001_Ukrainian.svg

MACHINE GUN PUTIN AND NUKE 8 MILLION RUSSIANS IN UKRAINE:

Page 6 Peres and Tymoshenko

Among the corrupt fascist Kiev politicians, former PM Yulia Tymoshenko (L), President Poroshenko, and Prime Minister Arseney Yatsenyuk, have specifically stated that the target of genocide is ethnic Russian Eastern Orthodox Christians in the richest industrialized region of Ukraine, where there are coalmines and undeveloped oil and gas deposits.

Israeli President Peres with Yulia Tymoshenko, Jan. 2007. ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย ย Source: โ€œPlaited Lady Out On The Offensiveโ€, Kiev Ukraine News Blog, Jan. 25, 2007. http://news.kievukraine.info/2007/01/plaited-lady-out-on-offensive.htmlย 

Former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko (President Obamaโ€™s preferred candidate to win the May 25, 2014 election), said in a tapped phone conversation [https://archive.today/jbTDP], leaked to the public on March 24, 2014:

โ€œWe must grab arms and go whack those damn katsaps [a Ukrainian word used to refer to the Russians in a negative tone] together with their leader โ€ฆ Iโ€™ll use all my connections, Iโ€™ll raise the whole world โ€“ as soon as Iโ€™m able to โ€“ in order to make sureโ€ฆ Bugger!... not even scorched earth wonโ€™t remain where Russia stand.โ€


Despite being incapacitated by spinal disc hernia the ex-PM stressed sheโ€™s ready to โ€œgrab a machine gun, you know what Iโ€™m saying, and go shoot this bastard [Putin] in the forehead.โ€


Asked, rhetorically, by her counterparty, "what should we do now with the 8 million Russians that stayed in Ukraine. They are outcasts". She replied: "They must be killed with nuclear weapons."

Source: www.youtube.com/watch?v=shG1b8DGnkU https://archive.today/jbTDP#selection-1393.140-1401.1ย 

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ

International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq (Kuala Lumpur)

War Crimes Complaint, November 5, 2010,

By Leuren Moret, p. 63.

Overt and covert pressure for new nuclear weapons was driven by: (1) politicians - who fund wars to secure natural resources in weaker third world countries, for the international bankers; (2) by the military โ€“ whose job is to kill people and destroy things, and since WW II to carry out depopulation of civilians, and (3) leaders at the nuclear weapons labs โ€“ who have a vested interest in continuing development of nuclear weapons in order to guarantee their own job security.

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ

US PRESIDENTIAL AND CONGRESSIONAL WAR CRIMINALS: On numerous occasions in the past year, President Obama with some members of Congress, threatened to provide โ€œlethal weaponsโ€ to the Kiev Junta, and Sec. of State John Kerry provided mini-nukes to the Kiev Junta in November 2014, as well as other advanced military weapons and advisors.

SEE: โ€œIntel: US Mini-Nukes Delivered to Ukraine; Poroshenkoโ€™s Family Urgently Leaves the Countryโ€, futuristrendcast.wordpress.com, February 17, 2015. https://futuristrendcast.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/intel-us-mini-nukes-delivered-to-ukraine-poroshenkos-family-urgently-leaves-the-country/ย 

President Obama and Congress are fully aware that many of the weapons such as depleted uranium, nuclear warheads over 5 kt, 4th generation nuclear weapons, and exotic weapons such as D.I.M.E. (see paper and 2 of its refs. below) violate International, Federal, and military law:

KEY PAPERS ON D.I.M.E. - Dense Inert Metal Eplosive

J. Kalinich et al.: Embedded Weapons-Grade Tungsten Alloy Shrapnel Rapidly Induces Metastatic High-Grade Rhabdomyosarcomas in F344 Rats, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, 2005. ย ย http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.7791ย 

Reference: Gilman JPW 1962. Metal carcinogenesis. II. A study on the carcinogenic activity of cobalt, copper, iron, and nickel compounds, Cancer Res 22:158โ€“165.13898693

Reference: Tomasovic SP, Coghlan LG, Gray KN, Mastromarion AJ, Travis EL 1988. IACUC evaluation of experiments requiring death as an end point: a cancer centerโ€™s recommendations, Lab Animal 17:31โ€“34.

Since 1990 when the Iraq war started, Congress (most members are lawyers) has been repeatedly informed of the lethal impact of weapons newly introduced by President George H.W. Bush in Iraq: depleted uranium, tactical battlefield nuclear weapons, 4th generation nuclear and other exotic weapons. Later D.I.M.E. was introduced as a metal alloy added to munitions that causes 100% tumorgenesis and cancer deaths in 9 months. Extensive testimony in Congress since 1990, has grimly reported the genocidal public health and environmental effects on the Iraqi people and U.S. troops. Depleted uranium has also had a global effect [FIG. 5-8]. Under US Federal Code Title 50, Chapter 40 Sec. 2302, weapons that qualify under any of the three categories listed in the code, are in violation of war conventions, international law and agreements, U.S. Federal law, and military law, but this is ironically dismissed by the โ€œRule of Lawโ€ Obama administration.

VIDEO: โ€œUkrainian Deputy: US to stage a civil war in Ukraine!โ€ Nov. 20, 2013. ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  [This was before Maidan. (english subtitles/transcript)] http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=223_1423050540#1sEOx4UgS8whjGVs.99

As the Obama administration knowingly repeats violations of US and International Law, as well as CIA mishandling and misguidance of the illegal Kiev Junta, and CIA funding of the extreme right Nazi and fascist groups since WW II ended, the result has not worked out well for the U.S. or for the Russian-speaking citizens in the war zone many of whom were killed, injured, and/or had houses destroyed. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerryโ€™s foreign policy and โ€œclever schemeโ€ for Ukraine, enhanced by President Poroshenkoโ€™s โ€œmagical thinkingโ€, has resulted in an acceleration in the number of deaths (at least 50,000 for 2014), the financial chaos and collapse of Ukraine, and growing awareness and outrage in Ukraine and across the globe, at the humanitarian disaster in Novorussia.

PUTINโ€™S COURSE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DIPLOMACY: In comparison to President Obamaโ€™s policy in the Ukraine of brute force, racketeering and extortion, and blackmail of Chancelor Angela Merkel, Russian President Vladimir Putin has followed a cautious and conservative course of diplomatic negotiations, demanding strict adherence to international law. He has been providing scheduled humanitarian convoys of goods to victims in the war zone, and to families of coalminers who died in an explosion on March 2, 2015.

SEE: โ€œUkraine coal mine: Dozens feared dead in Zasyadko gas blastโ€, BBC, March 4, 2015. ย http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31725243ย 

The separatists, who make up the volunteer militia, are winning on the battlefield, and in the court of public opinion. They have also created a new global awareness of the rising fascist Nazi movements in European countries, funded by the CIA since the end of WW II. They are part of GLADIO now secretly under NATO, as a leave-behind-army the US set up in Europe in 1945.

UKRAINE GENOCIDE BANKRUPTING THE โ€˜ATLANTICISTSโ€™: In contrast, the US brute force agenda pursuing an arrogant doctrine of WMD and nuclear genocide by targeting the civilian population in Novorussia, has not won the war on the battlefield or public opinion for the โ€œNorth Atlanticโ€ globalists. In fact, geopolitically, the Ukraine crisis has bankrupted the EU and NATO, and drained the U.S., but had little negative effect on Putin and Russia. In fact the Ukraine crisis has strengthened Putinโ€™s position internally and internationally, boosted diversification of Russiaโ€™s sources for commodities, turned Russia internally to self-sufficient manufacture of military hardware and food production, and expanded global partnerships with new trading opportunities and markets in the energy sector.

SANCTIONS BACKFIRE AS RUSSIA DIVESTS FROM THE WEST: The stabilization of the Russian Federation as a consequence of global media attacks, sanctions, and demonization of Russia and Putin by western economic interests, has caused an unexpected benefit โ€“ a Russian Renaissance unifying the Federation, while backfiring on western economic critics. Imposition of western sanctions based on fraudulent statements, is changing global public perception. The global media attacks on Putin have showcased BRICS as a new international banking system that gives hope to people and economies around the world strangled by western bankers, and the new younger and stronger leaders. Alexis Tsipras (Greece), Matteo Renzi (Italy), and countries like Slovakia and Hungary are now standing up to that corrupt banking system. It also tarnishes and further exposes the diabolical partnership of the Anglo-American permanent war crimes racketeering syndicate, a far more ruthless criminal global network than the Kiev Junta with their ties to Mossad/Israel and the CIA โ€œWall Street mafiaโ€.

SEE: N. Barkin, A. Rinke: โ€œGermans in shock as new Greek leader starts with a bangโ€, Reuters, Jan.28, 2015. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/28/us-greece-politics-germany-idUSKBN0L121R20150128ย 

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ

International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq

War Crimes Complaint, November 5, 2010

By Leuren K. Moret, p. 63.

At the time of the push for indefinite extension of the NPT in 1995, hypocritically President Clinton renewed the declaration of negative security assurancesโ€˜ to 170 non-nuclear countries (the rest of the world except the nuclear states). The US government insisted that the declaration was legally non-binding, however the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found it legally binding:

The United States reaffirms that it will not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States except in the case of an invasion or any other attack on the United States, its territories, its armed forces or other troops, its allies, or on a State toward which it has a security commitment, carried out or sustained by such a non-nuclear weapon State in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon State.

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ

POLITICIANS WITH VESTED INTERESTS: Through the son of Vice President Joe Biden, and stepson of Secretary of State John Kerry, both politicians are linked to lucrative international oil companies and mineral contracts in the Novorussia war zone. After the battle in the Debaltsevo cauldron forced Ukraine govt. troops out, it was discovered that Ukrainian govt. troops occupying an area in the Debaltsevo region for the past year, had been protecting U.S. foreign interests prospecting, conducting seismic studies, and drilling for oil and gas in villages in the govt. troops occupied war zone. Thirty to forty U.S. manufactured trucks, seismic and drilling equipment, and living quarters (trailers) were camped with the Ukraine National Guard at the exploration site near Shishkovo village. The exploration company NADRA was working for Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell through contracts oligarch Igor Kolomoisky had negotiated.

Page 9 Pic 1 & 2. 20150302 U.S. Shale gas mining/exploration equipment found at abandoned National Guard poistions Debaltsevo Cauldron

Both Biden and Kerry are indirectly vestedย in the Chevron and Royal Dutch Shellย holdings via family members, through criminal oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, owner of the PrivatBank involved with the oil companies. ย Biden and Kerry family members sit on the BOD of PrivatBank. Kolomoisky, a dual Israeli Ukrainian citizen, funds and controls three of the mostย criminally independent battalions embedded with pro-government troops in the ongoingย war. He is involved in organ trafficking ofย citizens kidnapped by battalions in the war zone, where he sentย refrigeratedย trucks to the battlefield to pick-up harvested organs. In abandoned govt. troop camps, lists with medical records of specific citizens targeted for organ harvesting, were found by the militia.ย 

Opposition to fracking (involving Kominoisky), by Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell oil companies in Novorussia, triggered the separatist movement in eastern Ukraine in April 2014. ย 

"Now we know that US weapons intended for Ukraine are actually intended to defend US energy interests, and the weapons are simply needed to silence the annoying Russian locals, who dare to speak out against the destruction of local ecology, the profits from which no one even planned to share โ€ฆ

Kristina Rus,ย March 3, 2015

Source: K. Rus, โ€œUkrainian army leaves American fracking equipment behind after retreating from Donbassโ€,ย ย freeukrainenow.org, March 3, 2015. http://freeukrainenow.org/tag/shishkovo/ย  VIDEO:_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4sk-WJAr4Iย 

Strong opposition by citizens to poisoning the water supply by fracking eastern Ukraine, as well as strong resistance by the separatists to the CIA coup and installation of the illegal Kiev Junta in February 2014, led to the present conflict. US politicians VP Biden and Sec. of State Kerry, indirectly but personally vested in the oil and gas contracts, encouraged and supported the war.

UPDATE: The NADRA group has recently rebranded itself as TUTKOVSKY and is now registered in Nicosia, Cyprus, under Ukraine, UK, and Russian ownership: ย 

The second important reason for this re-branding is that there are already more than 50 companies using NADRA as their brand. Some of them operate in oil & gas exploration and production and provide related services. Such situation made us a lot of problems during last decade as not only good but also bad news have been frequently imputed to our company as a leading Ukrainian service company. ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย 

Source:ย http://nadragroup.com/ย 

IQ DECLINE IN EUROPE - HUMAN COST OF DEPLETED URANIUM POISON DUST FROM WARS IN IRAQ, YUGOSLAVIA, AND AFGHAN: ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย ย In Ukraine few people are aware that nuclear weapons are not just indiscriminate killers (WMD) of the targeted ethnic Russians, but also all Ukrainians, non-citizens, Christians, Jews, Muslims, and all living things on and off the battlefield throughout Ukraine and across all borders. ย Radiation respects no borders [FIG. 5(a)], no socio-economic class, and no religion. ย It is an equal opportunity killer. ย For example, [FIG. 5(b)] presents UK govt. data on uranium levels detected in the British atmosphere from 1998-2003, from depleted uranium, 4th generation nuclear weapons, and other lethal weapons used by US and UK forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

FIG. 5(a): RADIATION-CAUSED DECLINE IN IQ BY COUNTRY: FROM BOMB TESTING, AND IN NUCLEAR CONTAMINATED WAR ZONES: Bomb testing contamination lowered IQ in Ireland and Portugal. NATO attacks on Yugoslavia with DU caused the greatest decline in IQ in areas of heaviest fighting (darkest red areas Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Albania). Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contaminated the eastern Mediterranean and USย [FIG. 8].ย And Chernobyl had a large effect on Eastern Europe. The U.S. has the highest rate of mental illness in the world (26% of the population) due to 1300 nuclear bomb tests the US govt. conducted in Nevadaย [FIG. 13].

Source: MAP: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?70485-Interesting-Map-about-Europe-s-IQ; ย โ€œIntelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences, R. Lynn and T. Vanhanen (2012). ย https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/intelligence-a-unifying-construct-for-the-social-sciences-richard-lynn-and-tatu-vanhanen.pdfย 

Image #5b DU in UK atmosphere fig13-uran-aldermaston

FIG. 5(b): DEPLETED URANIUM IN THE BRITISH ATMOSPHERE 1998-2003:ย The British nuclear weapons facility at Aldermaston reported depleted uranium in the atmosphere measured between April 4, 1998-November 6, 2003.ย There should be no uranium in the air.ย The largest peaks required official warnings to the UK government, during Tora Bora bombingย of Afghanistan and the 2003 Iraq war, but the U.K. government officially denied it to the public. This graph does not include fission products produced by 4th generation nuclear weapons and tactical battlefield nukes introduced to the battlefield in Iraq and Afghanistan. Source: Busby, C., Morgan, S., โ€œDid the use of Uranium weapons in Gulf War 2 result in contamination of Europe? Evidence from the measurements of the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), Aldermaston, Berkshire, UKโ€, Sunday Times Online, February 19, 2006. http://leurenmoret.info/_Media/fig13-uran-aldermaston.jpegย 

The poison dust from war zones in the Middle East and Central Asia arrived 5-7 days later from Iraq and Afghanistan, poisoning the Mediterranean, Europe, and beyond. Increases in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) were reported in medical journals in 20 regions of Europe following the 1995 NATO attack on Afghanistan.ย 

page 12 radiation being flung out from the uranium create snowflake-like patterns inside the cloud chamber, cloudylab

URANIUM 238 PARTICLE IN A CLOUD CHAMBER:ย High energy alpha tracks (tear shaped) and electron tracks (narrow tracks) are ejected from the Uranium nucleus and under the right conditions, a single track can cause cancer. (animated image)

Source: R. Gray, โ€œThe invisible world of RADIATION revealed: Cloud chamber lets you watch the patterns produced as uranium decaysโ€, DAILY MAIL, March 12, 2015. ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2991818/The-invisible-world-RADIATION-revealed-Cloud-chamber-lets-scientists-watch-patterns-produced-uranium-decays.htmlย 

Ms. Moret linked the unexplained sudden deaths, to US and British depleted uranium weaponry, in herย 2010 Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Complaintย [International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq, Nov. 5, 2010, p.89]:ย 

In 2004, the British medical journalย Lancetย reported sudden increases in unexplained infant deaths in 20 regions of Europe that began about 1990, when depleted uranium weaponry was introduced for the first time to the battlefield, by the US and the UK, in Gulf War I in Iraq.ย 

Source: Carpenter, R.G. et al., โ€œSudden unexplained infant death in 20 regions in Europe: case control study,โ€ย Lancet,ย Vol. 363, Jan. 17, 2004, pp. 185-191.

Carpet bombing with depleted uranium, U.S. use of D.I.M.E., depleted uranium in all munitions during the attacks, and other lethal weapons caused illnesses and deaths in Yugoslavia, and infant deaths and illnesses in larger regions throughout Europe. [FIG. 6 right]

FIG. 6: 2007 EU PUBLIC DEBT INCREASES AS POPULATION SHARPLY DECLINES. (L) From gradual to a sharp increase that began in 2007, European public debt has increased rapidly in parallel with (R) the working age population (15-64) that sharply declined for the same time period 2007-2013. The use of D.I.M.E. added to depleted uranium weapons in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is the most likely cause.ย Source: T. Durden, โ€œWhy Europe's Doomsayers Are Right, In One Chartโ€, ZeroHedge.com, Sept. 30, 2014.ย http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-09-30/why-europes-doomsayers-are-right-one-chartย 

EXCESS DEATHS FROM CAMEL โ€˜PLAGUEโ€™, SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, CHRONIC ILLNESSES: [See FIG. 6 for period 2006-2013] ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย In May and June 2007, there were also very large numbers of unexplained camel deaths in the Middle East and N. Africa, with 3-5000 deaths in Saudi Arabia alone. ย 

SEE: R. McKie, โ€œCamel 'plague' puzzles scientistsโ€, TheGuardian.com, Dec. 22, 2007.ย http://www.theguardian.com/science/2007/dec/23/animalbehaviour.scienceofclimatechangeย 

The main cause of excess deaths in humans and animals in the Middle East and Europe [FIG. 6 right] had to have an environmental cause. An Iraqi missile attack on the munitions depot at U.S. Forward Operating Base Camp Falcon in Baghdad, caused $1 billion worth of depleted uranium munitions (all the DU munitions the US had in Iraq) to burn for days. This caused heavy pollution of neighboring regions with uranium dust, and was even detected in drinking water in Los Angeles indicating it was global [FIG. 7]. The Iraq and Afghan wars have contaminated the Sahal Desert with radioactive particles, and millions of tons of Saharan dust is carried around the world each year, mixing the smog of all wars globally in one year. ย  ย 

VIDEO: โ€œNASA | Satellite Tracks Saharan Dust to Amazon in 3-Dโ€ย https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygulQJoIe2Y&spfreload=10ย 

The long-term effects of depleted uranium and nuclear weapons, from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, have irreversibly devastated the European economy [FIG. 6]. The Chernobyl disaster in 1986, was a False Flag staged to collapse the Soviet economy, and end the Cold War in 1991. It also had a pronounced global effect and reduced fertility in some regions (for example Iran) by one child per woman.

URANIUM CONTAMINATION IN LOS ANGELES DRINKING WATER:

THE KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES COMMISSION

FIG. 7: DEPLETED URANIUM IN LOS ANGELES DRINKING WATER 1999-2008: The City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has reported uranium levels in drinking water since 1999. Large increases in uranium contamination of drinking water correlate with uranium wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and very large increases in diabetes nationwide [FIG. 8]. Source: Leuren Moret (graph), May 5, 2010. "Data from Annual Water Quality Reports (1999-2008)," Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power. ย http://www.leurenmoret.info/currents/fukushima-impact-of-fallout.htmlย 

The destruction of the global environment by contamination with pernicious poisons from nuclear materials used on and off the battlefield since 1990 in Iraq, and since 2001 in Afghanistan, is permanent [FIG. 7]. Radioactive nanoparticle dust is carried on air currents throughout Europe and the northern hemisphere within days. Atmospheric convective mixing throughout the entire global biosphere occurs in one year, causing a global decline in fertility and accelerated depopulation due to nuclear pollution.

Image #8 Diabetes Incidence (l), Map (r)

FIG. 8: DIABETES IยญNCREASES IN THE UNITED STATES 1958-2000:

(L) Diabetes reported by prevalence (left axis) and incidence in millions (right axis), correlates with bomb testing, nuclear power, and U.S. wars for oil in Iraq, and for opium in Afghanistan. (R) A large increase in diabetes nationwide for the decade 1990-2000 strongly correlates with increases in uranium in the British atmosphere and in Los Angeles drinking water for the same period. ย Source: Engelgau, M. et.al, โ€œThe Evolving Diabetes Burden in the United States,โ€ ย Annals of Internal Medicine, June 1, 2004, v.140, no.11, pp. 945-950.ย ย 

GLOBAL TABOO COVERTLY LIFTED BY KISSINGER ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS: ย As mentioned, the introduction of previously taboo radiological and nuclear weapons on the battlefield in 1990, was by President George H.W. Bush in Iraq. A new form of warfare emerged with depopulation and infertility as the new agenda for wars, concepts developed by U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in the 1970โ€™s, through his State Department Office of Population Affairs. In fact he made depopulation official U.S. National Policy, and the top priority of Foreign Policy. Kissinger stated at a National Security Council meeting on Dec. 10, 1974, that overpopulation was a greater threat than nuclear war, and thatย depopulation would be used in third world countries where minerals were located that were needed to maintain U.S. hegemony.

National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200), http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Study_Memorandum_200ย 


FORENSIC EVIDENCE: TOCHKA-U NUCLEAR WARHEAD AND YIELD


Memo to General Leslie Groves (classified)

Oct. 30, 1943, Manhattan Project

The military purpose for radiological weapons suggested for development in 1943, was to cause permanent contamination of terrain, atmosphere, food and drinking water, and biological systems that would result in depopulation. ย Source: Conant, J.B., A.H. Compton, H.C. Urey, โ€•โ€Memo to General Leslie Grovesโ€ (classified), Oct. 30, 1943, Manhattan Project, U.S. Government document.ย http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/Groves-Memo-Manhattan30oct43.htmย 

INTRODUCTION:

Image #9 TOCHKA-U on TRUCK, ss21_scarab

The Tochka short-range ballistic missile can carry conventional, chemical or nuclear warheads

FIG. 9: KIEV VERSION OF GLOBAL โ€œNUCLEAR KABUKI THEATERโ€ IN EASTERN UKRAINE. The illegal Kiev Junta has nuked the pro-Russian separatist population in eastern Ukraine for the past year with: (1) hundreds of thousands of tons of depleted uranium poison gas weapons (800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki Bombs), (2) three serious reactor explosions caused by using Westinghouse nuclear fuel rods (wrong size) in Soviet-era reactors at two nuclear power plants, (3) digging up buried Soviet era nuclear waste for dispersal on the population in war zone, (4) downed Malaysian Airlines flight MH 17 with a fighter jet depleted uranium missile and from the ground a BUK depleted uranium missile, (5) a HAARP manipulated Fukushima nuclear typhoon attack on eastern war zone with radiation,(6) and a TOCHKA-U nuclear ballistic missile strike on the largest city in Donbass. Source: Image โ€“ Military-Today.com; โ€œIntel: US Mini-Nukes Delivered to Ukraine; Poroshenkoโ€™s Family Urgently Leaves the Countryโ€, futuristrendcast.wordpress.com, February, 17, 2015. https://futuristrendcast.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/intel-us-mini-nukes-delivered-to-ukraine-poroshenkos-family-urgently-leaves-the-country/ย 

In November 2014, Jesuit trained Secretary of State and Hapsburg Empire HofJudah (Court Jew) John Kerry transferred 4 mini-nukes to Ukraine after President Poroshenko (Russian Mafia) made a personal visit to Washington D.C., with an urgent request to Congress and CIA Jesuit President Obama, for โ€œlethal weaponsโ€. When the war started in April 2014, Poroshenko had at least 50 Soviet era TOCHKA-U missiles in the military arsenal.

Source: โ€œIntel: US Mini-Nukes Delivered to Ukraine; Poroshenkoโ€™s Family Urgently Leaves the Countryโ€, futuristrendcast.wordpress.com, February, 17, 2015.ย https://futuristrendcast.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/intel-us-mini-nukes-delivered-to-ukraine-poroshenkos-family-urgently-leaves-the-country/ย 

ASHEN FACED ANNOUNCEMENT OF AA-60 NUCLEAR WARHEAD:ย On the morning after the midnight Kiev Junta missile strike on Donetsk, ashen-faced and visibly shaken by the news he was about to present, Donbass Assistant Minister of Defense Eduard Basurin held the first press conference about the Kiev Junta missile strike. He indicated that a TOCHKA-U (NATO - SS-21 SCARAB) Soviet-era short-range ballistic missile was โ€œprobably the delivery systemโ€, and that it may have been armed โ€œwith an AA-60 nuclear warheadโ€. The AA-60 nuclear warhead, with a variable 10-100 kt yield can be adjusted just before launch, Mr. Basurin said was โ€œmost likely fired by Ukrainian government troopsโ€ because the Novorusia militia did not have any.ย What is important to remember is that the TOCHKA-U is aย short-range ballistic missile with 3 different warhead options: conventional, biological, and nuclear. The selectable 10-100 kt, blast yield of the TOCHKA-U nuclear warhead is much more powerful and destructive than tactical battlefield nuclear warheads [FIG. 2(b)]. Tactical nukes are limited to 5 kt or less, and leave a small smoke column [FIG. 13], not the easily identifiable mushroom cloud.

Images [FIG. 18] taken of the missile blast in Donetsk close to midnight on Feb. 8, 2015, suggest that the Donetsk TOCHKA-U carried a nuclear warhead. Images from citizen sources show a nuclear blast with a characteristic fireball and mushroom cloud [FIG. 1,15]. However most of the sources of the images have not been identified. Until careful physical radiation measurements have been made around the crater and region, and radiation exposure of residents has been surveyed in the region, the investigation of the nuclear missile strike is incomplete and/or is a coverup. The parameters of the scientific phenomena seem to be internally consistent indicating it was a nuclear warhead and detonation in Donetsk on the night of Feb. 8, 2015. It cannot be a random nuclear missile attack, but must be related to retaliation by government troops for the encirclement of 8000 soldiers in the Debaltsevo cauldron. And capture of the village Logvinovo gave the militia control of the only route (the highway Artyomovsk-Debaltsevo) out of the cauldron. More than 6500 govt. soldiers and mercenaries were then killed, and the militia gained war trophies that comprised 25% of govt. hardware: tanks, APCs etc., big artillery, and huge amounts of munitions from abandoned weapons depots.

Image #10a (left) Tochka-u dud Logvinovo -20150228- Soldier with Tochka-U which was released towards Logvinovo, (right) satel. Debaltsevo dead Ukies- 20150228 Sat Image Logvinovo - Debaltsevo Cauldron

FIG. 10(a): TOCHKA-U MISSILE FAILED TO EXPLODE OUTSIDE LOGVINOVO LAUNCHED BY GOVT. SOLDIERS KILLED TRYING TO BREAK OUT OF CAULDRON, FEB. 2015. (L) Short-range ballistic missile launched by desperate exhausted Ukrainian troops attempting to break out of Debaltsevo cauldron near key village of Logvinovo. (R) Satellite photo of the consequences of attacks on Logvinovo on the highway Artyomovsk-Debaltsevo, dead and frozen soldiers everywhere lying on snow. Out of 8000 govt. soldiers trapped in the Debaltsevo cauldron, 6500 were killed and nearly every soldier that survived was wounded. Source: โ€œThe war in Novorossia Online 02.28.2015 Chronicleโ€, Voice of Sevastopol.com, Feb. 28, 2015. http://en.voicesevas.ru/news/yugo-vostok/3556-the-war-in-novorossia-online-02282015-chronicle.htmlย  VIDEO: โ€œUkraine: Bloody aftermath of DPRโ€™s battle for Logvinovoโ€ [Ukraine: Ukrainian Army officers ambushed, wounded, interrogated] *GRAPHIC* ย https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtbD0xIB8v0 ย  ย [01:15]

Although all nuclear weapons were required to be turned over to the Russian government when the Soviet Union collapsed, many ended up on the international nuclear black market (Turkey), or as the TOCHKA-U evidence in Ukraine now reveals, the transfer back to Russia never occurred. Fifty of the TOCHKA-U Soviet era ballistic missiles were still stockpiled in the Ukrainian government military arsenal when hostilities started in April 2014. During hostilities earlier in the summer of 2014, the Ukrainian government troops had fired 3 conventional TOCHKA-U missiles on the same day at Novorussia civilian targets, and launched one into Russia as provocation. The Novorussia militia and the Russian border defense each shot down an incoming TOCHKA-U, and the third one landed on the ground in Novorussia but failed to explode.

A SECOND PRESS CONFERENCE ON TOCHKA-U: Several days after the February 8, 2015, TOCHKA-U ballistic missile attack on Donetsk, the Assistant Minister of Defenseย Eduard Basurin, held a second press conference to report on the official investigation, and displayed debris from a TOCHKA-U missile conventional warhead blast. This was not from the Feb. 8 attack because the missile is vaporized in the nuclear blast. He said that further investigation had confirmed that a TOCHKA-U ballistic missile, possibly armed with a nuclear warhead, was fired by Ukrainian troops while attacking Donetsk civilian industrial infrastructure on the night of Feb. 8, 2015.

Image #10b Basurin press confer.

FIG. 10(b): TOCHKA-U MISSILE DEBRIS FROM WARHEAD BLAST:ย Assistant Minister of Defense Eduard Basurin, held a second press conference on the nuclear blast in Donetsk, and displayed missile debris from a warhead blast.ย Source: Eduard Basurin update on TOCHKA-U nuclear missile, Voice of Sevastopol. ย https://youtu.be/w_JWdDosgLMย 

INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC EXPERT ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS: The author, Ms. Leuren Moret (LeurenMoret.info) worked as a staff scientist in two U.S. nuclear weapons labs, and is an international war crimes scientific expert witness on radiological,ย nuclear, 4th generation nuclear, and exotic weapons. She participated in 4 International War Crimes Tribunals: International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan (Tokyo), International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq (Istanbul), International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq (Kuala Lumpur), and informally on the International Criminal Tribunal for Palestine (Kuala Lumpur). Ms. Moretโ€™s expertise in nuclear weapons has been used below in the analysis of the Donetsk ballistic missile attack.

For reference in assessing nuclear explosion phenomena below, the classic Department of the Army Pamphlet, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, by S. Glasstone and P.J. Dolan (1977), has been used and can be found online (below) for those interested in learning more. Chapters are available online on a Chinese military website with a simple search. ย ย http://nnsa.energy.gov/sites/default/files/nnsa/inlinefiles/glasstone%20and%20dolan%201977.pdfย 

RUSSIAN/SOVIET VERSUS U.S. WEAPONS SYSTEMS: In general, Russian/Soviet and U.S. weapons systems are very different. Russian/Soviet weapons systems are expediently designed to maximize effect and minimize difficulties of assembly and price. U.S. weapon systems are over designed, with too much detail to precision (due to overfunding of military budgets), lack of practicality from the onset (making systems temperamental), and wrong priorities based for example, on benefits to Congressional committee members taking government funds (โ€œporkโ€) back to their states. In that illogical and bizarre process of โ€œweapons design by Congressional committeeโ€, manufacturing is distributed across Congressional districts by political will, and manufactured parts from many states must fit together and operate correctly. For these reasons, the Russian/Soviet conventional weapons and nuclear designs are more practical and efficient than U.S. designs. However when the scientific constraints are considered in any investigation, comparisons can be made despite design differences in Soviet/Russian and U.S. systems. The principles of nuclear explosion phenomena - physics, scientific constraints, atomicity, physical processes of the blast, and physical characteristics of a nuclear detonation in general - are similar whether it is a Russian/Soviet or U.S. nuclear warhead as described below.

An analysis of the forensic evidence gathered from the Donetsk TOCHKA-U short-range ballistic missile nuclear strike will determine many things about the nature of the warhead.

THE FINAL PIECE OF EVIDENCE MISSING:ย It remains to be determined whether or not radioactive fission and neutron activation products from a nuclear detonation were detected and measured. The most critical evidence that has been suppressed, and hardly mentioned in any news source, is with respect to the Donetsk TOCHKA-U warhead blast. The absence of confirmation or denial, of fresh fission products detected at the crater site, is a serious omission of sensitive and critical data regarding nuclear pollution potentially exposing a large populated area in Donbass. Considering that there is a global effect as well, it suggests an international cover-up, similar to the aftermath of Chernobyl, and the recent very large unreported release of radiation from two reactor explosions on the night of November 27, 2014, at the Zaporhyzne nuclear power plant [FIG. 25, 26, 27].


NUCLEAR EXPLOSION PHENOMENA:

MISSILE IMPACT

Image #11 (left) Missile test NTS, (right) missile impact

FIG. 11: NEVADA TEST SITE MISSILE TEST. โ€œThe conventional laser-guided missile, after smashing into a hardened concrete bunker, penetrated 2-4 meters (6.6โ€™-13โ€™) before detonating its 240-kg high-explosive warhead. Even the best earth-penetrating weapons reach depths of only about 6 meters (19.7 feet). This explosion clearly was not contained by its surrounding cap of concrete, and left a crater 5 meters (16.4โ€™) wide.ย Source: Photos courtesy of the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency." Source: R.W. Nelson, Nuclear Bunker Busters, Mini-Nukes, and the US Nuclear Stockpile, Physics Today (2003). http://pauldavidtuff.com/PDF%20Files/Nuke%20Bunker%20Buster.pdfย 

MISSILE IMPACT PHENOMENA: In a paper published by Robert W. Nelson, โ€œNuclear Bunker Busters, Mini-Nukes, and the US Nuclear Stockpile,โ€ in Physics Today (November 2003), the sequence of events in the detonation of a nuclear explosion is explained by the diagram in [Fig. 12]. In the U.S., nuclear warheads on missiles are designed to explode in the air or when they touch the ground. In the air, in either case, only a small fraction of the total yield (total energy released) is transferred as seismic energy by the blast wave, into the ground. A mechanical impedance mismatch occurs from the large density difference between the air and ground and has a large influence on the total yield of the warhead.

Image #12 craters

FIG. 12:ย A Shallow-Buried Underground Nuclear Explosion.ย (a-b) The underground nuclear detonation generates a strong shock wave that vaporizes a cavity of rock with an initial radius 2W1/3 m and melts rock out to roughly twice this distance. (c-f) There is little post-shock heating beyond the melt radius, but the shock is strong enough to crush rock approximately 12 times farther away, at 50W1/3 m. The cavity gases continue to cool rapidly as the cavity expands. A combination of gas acceleration and the compression and rarefaction phases of the seismic wave ejects materials contaminated with fresh fission products out of the crater at the surface. ย ย Source: N. M. Short, "The Definition of True Crater Dimensions by Post-Shot Drilling," rep. no. UCRL-7787, U. of California, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore, Calif. (1964). http://pauldavidtuff.com/PDF%20Files/Nuke%20Bunker%20Buster.pdfย 

MINIATURIZATION OF NUCLEAR DEVICES: In other words โ€œMiniNukesโ€ are โ€œlegalโ€ despite being the most efficient form of nuclear war. When the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty ended atmospheric testing, new research programs on miniaturization of nuclear devices made it possible to design nuclear warheads producing very small (selectable in some cases such as the 10-100kt TOCHKA-U AA-60 nuclear warhead) nuclear yields of 5 kt or smaller for strategic or tactical battlefield nukes. Surprisingly they are exempt from the NPT treaty. And they are the most efficient form of nuclear war because the highest concentration of radioactive fission products (nearly 2000 are produced in a fission event), are concentrated in the materials ejected by the explosion as the crater forms, and spread throughout the local area. Ground blasts produce fission products concentrated in a local area, whereas air bursts in the atmosphere are dispersed over time and are slowly deposited in the environment or remain suspended in the atmosphere. Eighty five percent of the fission products from high altitude nuclear tests are still suspended in the upper atmosphere. For that reason, living near a nuclear power plant releasing fresh fission products daily is just a slower but deadlier form of nuclear war, carried out by chronic exposure to small doses of deadly fresh fission products in daily emissions. Yet it is โ€˜legalโ€™.

FIG. 13: NO MUSHROOM CLOUD - NUCLEAR WARHEADS LESS THAN 5 KT LEAVE A SMOKE COLUMN.

Development of low-yield nukes began in earnest, after the Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT) ended atmospheric testing in 1963. The 2.3 kt Cabriolet test was one of the early low-yield underground tests despite the PTBT, and produced a smoke column instead of the characteristic mushroom cloud. In 2000, research funding increased substantially for development of mini-nukes, D.I.M.E., 4th generation nukes and other exotic weapons, nanotechnology, and bio-weapons etc. Military operational applications of all of these technologies in the past 15 years make it clear that they were developed and are essential for global depopulation, not only in third world countries, but for any country in the world. ย ย Source: U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration, (NNSA).

The fresh and highly dangerous fission products from a nuclear warhead detonation are carried with the ground swell generated by the explosion [FIG. 13]. The ground swell travels in all directions for miles, poisoning water, land, and the atmosphere, and exposes local populations to certain death or long lingering radiation related illnesses.

SEE: B.Harwell and J.Gutteridge, Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine 4th Ed., Oxford Univ. Press (2007). [This is an excellent reference book on diseases that are caused by free radicals. Radiation is one of the largest producers known of free radicals.]

TWO NUCLEAR BOMBS IN THE SAME BUNKER BUSTER: In the 2005 Israeli attack on Lebanon, bomb crater analyses by Dr. Chris Busby analyzed at the British Govt. Radiation Laboratory at Harwell, indicated that โ€œspecialโ€ DU bunker buster bombs flown to Israel from the US in the middle of the conflict, contained a second, but until then unknown, โ€œexotic nuclear weaponโ€. The Harwell lab analyses of the Lebanon bomb crater samples provided neutron activation evidence that a 4th generation neutron bomb was present in the DU bunker buster. The neutron bomb causes non-radioactive materials in the bomb crater to become temporarily radioactive, from neutron activation for a period of about 10 days. During that time interval, the local population is exposed to neutron subatomic particles causing slow death of the population, without damaging the infrastructure. This particular 4th generation neutron bomb was developed at Livermore nuclear weapons lab, and according to some scientists, can be the size of a matchbox although this information is still classified.

Manhattan Project scientist Samuel Cohen, the physicist who invented the neutron bomb, received the highest Vatican medal from Pope John Paul II in 1979 for discovering the neutron bomb. This proves that the Vatican is actively supporting covert depopulation programs, and firmly establishes the link between nuclear weapons, depopulation, and the Jesuits. Since the conflict in eastern Ukraine has all the indications it is another Jesuit war, as Jesuits exterminating non-Catholics for the fourth time in 100 years in Ukraine, the possibility that neutron bombs will be used by pro-Government Ukrainian troops and/or American personnel on the battlefields of Novorussia, is a certainty since Sec. of State John Kerry transferred 4 mini-nukes to Ukraine in Nov. 2014. If there are large increases in cancer with rapid deaths reported within 9 months of exposure in Novorussia, then D.I.M.E. has been added to the radiological weapons and that originates in the US.

DEPLETED URANIUM PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT AS POISON GAS IN 1943: The unfortunate introduction of depleted uranium, a radiological poison gas weapon, designed in 1943 under the Manhattan Project, was introduced to the battlefield during the George H.W. Bush attack on Iraq in 1991. It blurred the distinction between nuclear and conventional weapons. The result is increasingly widespread use of radiological (depleted uranium), and small tactical nukes (used widely in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Lebanon, and possibly Mogadishu) to carry out the depopulation agenda by using nuclear pollution. Both DU and nuclear devices are WMD in violation all war crimes conventions, international agreements, and military law.

In 2003, Professor Katsuma Yagasaki from the University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan, estimated thatย 800 tons of depleted uranium is the atomicity* equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs.

Leuren Moret ย  ย  ย  ย  ย .

[Atomicity* is a term used to compare two nuclear bombs by the equivalent number of radioactive atoms produced in each. In this case, it is comparing the number of atoms in 800 tons of DU to the equivalent number of atoms in 83,000 20 kt nuclear bombs.] ย ย Source: The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War, World Uranium Weapons Conference 2003, Hamburg Oct. 16-19.ย http://www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/; ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  DOWNLOAD BOOK: http://www.grassrootspeace.org/depleted_uranium_hamburg03.htmlย 

This absolutely confirms that modern covert nuclear wars are targeting civilian populations with nuclear pollution as the mechanism for the New World Order global agenda of indiscriminate global depopulation, interacting in combination with chemtrails, GMO, vaccines, nanoparticulates, and other toxic vectors. The blatant use of nuclear materials has been taken to the extreme, as demonstrated in the Ukraine war zone, and exposes that the โ€œmodernโ€ (hybrid) war agenda is depopulation accelerated by the use of depleted uranium and tactical battlefield nukes and 4th generation nuclear weapons and blowing up nuclear reactors and battlefield chemical pollution producing a very toxic and fast acting โ€œsmog of warโ€. ย  ย ย 

DETONATION OF THE WARHEAD

CRITICALITY AND FISSION: Detonation of a nuclear weapon occurs when the uranium or plutonium core of fissile material inside a warhead is bombarded with energetic nuclear particles that destabilize the nucleus of the atoms in the weapons material making up the core of the nuclear device, and cause criticality or uncontrolled fission. After the primary chemical explosion or trigger goes off, very quickly criticality is reached, and the atoms in the core begin to release nuclear energy that bombards atoms around them. This causes a rapid cascade and acceleration of nuclear fission events that fragment the fissile material, releasing nuclear energy from the atoms, and that eventually blow the warhead apart as a secondary nuclear blast.

EMISSION OF THERMAL RADIATION IN TWO PULSES: In an airburst detonation, immediately after the explosion (criticality), the primary thermal radiation from the weapon residues is emitted from the fireball in two pulses [FIG. 14, FIG. 18]. The extremely high temperature is first converted to x-rays that are emitted and absorbed within a layer of a few feet of air. The energy is then re-emitted from the fireball as secondary thermal radiation and at a longer wavelength (ultraviolet, visible, and infrared rays).

Two initial pulses [FIG. 14] are visible in a video clip [FIG. 18(1a)] of the detonation of the TOCHKA-U blast in Donetsk, and are scientific evidence confirming it was a nuclear warhead.

Image #14 double pulses

FIG. 14: ENERGY FROM THE NUCLEUS CONVERTS TO HEAT AND LIGHT:ย Seen in an air burst, the rate of emission of thermal radiation (vertical scale) gives off very bright light initially in two pulses, but decreases over time and finally disappears within a minute or so. On the video clip two pulses can be seen, indicating the blast was from an airburst. ย ย Source: S. Glasstone, P.J. Doyle: The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Dept. of Army Pamphlet No.50-3 (1977), p.41 Fig. 2.39.

MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE REACHED THEN GRADUAL DECREASE: Immediately after the time of explosion, the temperature of the weapon material is several tens of millions of degrees, and the pressures are estimated to be many million atmospheres [Glasstone p.63]. Fission products, bomb casing, and other weapon components are subjected to blast temperatures hotter than the core of the sun and are vaporized. In contrast, the highest temperature reached by a high-explosive conventional weapon is 5000 C (9000ยบ F) and for that reason produces a less powerful blast wave. Depleted uranium [FIG. 15(a)] though not a conventional weapon, but a radiological weapon, releases energy from the nucleus by radioactive decay rather than by fission. Therefore it does not produce the extreme temperature or destructive shock wave of a fission weapon.

Image #15 DU burning (l), fireball Donetsk detonation (r)

FIG. 15: HYBRID WARS - ISRAEL BOMBS SYRIAN MILITARY WITH DU, KIEV JUNTA NUKES CITIZENS WITH NUCLEAR BALLISTIC MISSILE STRIKE.ย (L) Depleted uranium bunker buster bomb at impact with ground: fireball and fragmentation field of molten burning DU forms a radioactive nano-particle gas cloud on impact. DU is pyrophoric and can reach 5000 C, indicated by the white-hot molten DU fireball and debris field above left. Image of IDF bombing near Damascus, Syria, on May 5, 2013. (R) Kiev Junta strikes civilians in city of Donetsk with TOCHKA-U nuclear ballistic missile. First moments of detonation produced a nuclear fireball and blast cloud at temperatures hotter than the sun. Spherical shape of the fireball also indicates an air blast. ย ย Source: (a) DU bomb: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf1dNieV5q4, ย May 5, 2014; (b) YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGix83I4nUY,ย  J. Phillips, โ€œDid a tactical nuke just go off in Ukraine, big explosion rocks Donetskโ€, Epoch Times, Feb. 8, 2015. ย ย http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1243441-did-a-tactical-nuke-just-go-off-in-ukraine-big-explosion-rocks-donetsk/ย 

The image in [FIG. 15(b)] captured the first moments after detonation, and shows a growing spherical fireball and newly formed blast cloud above it. The mushroom cloud forms as it rises into the atmosphere, and indicates a nuclear blast. This is very strong evidence that a nuclear detonation in air close to the ground, was caused by the TOCHKA-U ballistic missile fired at Donetsk. People in Donetsk reported that many windows broke, and that many could feel the ground shake from the blast. There should be a seismic record of the blast in official data in eastern Europe and Russia, but there was no record of it in the USGS record.

THE FIREBALL

ENERGY IN THE NUCLEUS UNLEASHED: In less than a millionth of a second after detonation in air or shallow burial, large amounts of invisible X-rays radiate from the extremely hot weapon residues, fission products and residual plutonium that escaped fission, and forms a fireball [FIG. 16]. In the image, the new fireball has partially formed a shock front (blast wave)

FIG. 16: FIREBALL FROM SECRET TRINITY TEST, JULY 16, 1945. The fireball starts to form less than a millionth of a second after the explosion, and extreme heat transforms all matter into gas/plasma. Thermal radiation emitted as x-rays, is absorbed by the surrounding atmosphere. Formation of the fireball then triggers the effects of the nuclear explosion. ย ย Source: S. Glasstone, P.J. Dolan, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Dept. of the Army Pamphlet No. 50-3, (1977): Fig. 2.32. p.39. ย ย http://www.princeton.edu/~aglaser/lecture2007_weaponeffects.pdfย https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/effects/eonw_2.pdfย 

in the first stages, on the surface of the fireball. The shock wave travels faster than the fireball expands, and moves ahead in some cases faster than the speed of sound, like a wall of highly compressed air and slams into things with a very destructive force. When the fireball is no longer visible [see โ€œDonetsk Airblast Time Lapse Sequenceโ€ [FIG. 18(2a)], the blast wave has traveled miles from the blast and is many times more destructive than from a conventional weapon.

FIREBALL AND DIRT CLOUD: The fireball is an extremely high temperature luminous (incandescent) spherical mass of air and gaseous weapon residues [FIG. 16], with a decrease in brightness after about a millisec-ond (one thousandth of a second). Around the fireball a dirt cloud forms with the fission products, weapon residues, dirt from the crater and surrounding area that is sucked up into the dirt cloud as it rises [FIG. 17].

FIG. 17: CIRCULATION WITHIN THE RADIOACTIVE MUSHROOM CLOUD: Diagram of the torroidal circulation in the radioactive cloud of a nuclear explosion. ย ย Source: S. Glasstone, P.J. Dolan, p. 29: Fig. 2.07a.ย http://www.princeton.edu/~aglaser/lecture2007_weaponeffects.pdfย  https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/effects/eonw_2.pdfย 

The distance that the mushroom cloud was visible in Donbass has not been determined, but it has been reported that people 30 km (18.6 miles) away felt the shock wave.

In U.S. nuclear tests of less than 100 kt detonated in air, the glare in the night sky was visible 400 or more miles away. The brightness or luminescence due to surface temperatures of the fireball in an airburst is not related to the energy released in the blast or total yield of the warhead, but is similar for most air blasts.

CONDITIONS SET FOR HIGHEST LEVEL OF NUCLEAR CONTAMINATION: If the detonation is close to the ground like the Donetsk TOCHKA-U blast, or buried at a very shallow depth, a very large amount of dirt [FIG. 2(b)] is incorporated into the cloud and is well mixed with vaporized fission products and weapons residue as the radioactive vapors condense on dirt particles in the cooling phase of the cloud [FIG. 17].

These conditions of detonation cause the highest level of nuclear contamination in a dirt cloud, later released as fallout into the environment as the cloud expands, rises, and then cools. It is also incorporated in the base surge that rolls out from the detonation point in all directions across the ground for miles [FIG. 13].

For this reason, low altitude and ground bursts are the most deadly nuclear warhead detonations in terms of contamination from fallout and the ground surge causing widespread exposure of populations. Because the most complete mixing and contamination with nuclear materials (fresh fission products) of components in the cloud (dirt and vapor) occurs from this type of blast,ย it is the most efficient form of nuclear war because nearly all the fission products are mixed with what becomes fallout and contaminates the biosphere.ย Another reason is because the fission products are distributed in a small local area, where contamination will be more concentrated than is the case for high altitude or underground tests [FIG. 13].

MAXIMUM CONTAMINATION FOR HIGHEST KILL RATE: The miniaturization of nuclear weapons is obviously for the purpose of exposing a population and/or region to lethal pernicious poisons that kill, maim, and disease the population as well as causing permanent mutations in the DNA in all future generations from those exposed. This was clearly stated by Manhattan Project scientists Compton, Connant, and Urey, elite members of the S-1 Poison Gas Committee in their 1943 memo to the head of the Manhattan Project: โ€•โ€Memo to General Leslie Grovesโ€ (classified), Oct. 30, 1943, Manhattan Project, U.S. Government document.

The conditions of detonation selected for the TOCHKA-U missile attack on Donetsk, cause the highest level of nuclear contamination in a dirt cloud, later released as fallout into the environment as the cloud expands, rises, and then cools. It is also incorporated in the base surge that rolls out from the detonation point in all directions across the ground for miles. In [FIG. 13] the underground Cabriolet test had a 2.3 kt yield and the base surge traveled 2.5 miles.

The damage to the DNA affects all future generations of those exposed, and eventually destroys the viability and reproductive future of the exposed population. Due to the radiation released by Chernobyl in 1986, the average life expectancy of Russians was decreased by ten years, fertility has dropped globally, and radiation related illnesses have increased around the world.

After the dirt cloud forms [FIG. 16], the spherical fireball continues to grow and expand as it rises like a hot-air balloon at hundreds of feet per second [Fig. 17]. After one minute it has cooled so that it no longer emits visible radiation and is approximately 7.2 km (4.5 miles) high (about 5791.2m (19,000โ€™) for 10-20 kt yields) from the point of detonation [FIG. 1], and deadly fallout continues to slowly fall into the environment as the cloud cools [FIG. 17].


FIGURE 18: TOCHKA-U NUCLEAR PHENOMENA OF WARHEAD BLASTย 

DONETSK AIRBLAST TIME LAPSE SEQUENCE OF TOCHKA-U AA-60 WARHEAD:

[NOTE: In both video clips - 1(a) and 2(a) - the initial blast pulse starts after 05.06 seconds (or at 5 sec. and 6 frames). There are 30 frames-per-second in the original source video (URL for original video: https://youtu.be/ZGix83I4nUY) and in 1(a), but in 2(a) it is limited to every fifth frame from the original video.]

AA-60 NUCLEAR BLAST INITIAL PULSE (see FIG. 14).

20150208 _1a. Donetsk Pulse Sequence 05.06-05.12 ANIMATED, output_a68bB3

1(a) This animation capturesย from the first blast pulse [FIG.15b] to the beginningย of the second blast pulse, and can be seen [1(b)] frame by frame below in the stills strip: it is extracted from the original video of the blast. Source: YouTube: https://youtu.be/ZGix83I4nUY;ย video extraction by L.L.ย Battis (20150208 _1a. Donetsk Pulse Sequence 05.06-05.12 ANIMATED).

AA-60 NUCLEAR BLAST INITIAL PULSE IN FIG. 14: FRAME BY FRAME.

1(b) Donetsk initial pulse sequence frame by frame: 05.06-05.12 (2/10ths of a second) ย ย Source: YouTube: https://youtu.be/ZGix83I4nUY; L.L. Battis stills: (20150208 _1b. Donetsk Pulse Seq-05.06 -05.12).

In this sequence of images, the rapid initial pulse [FIG.15b] is complete and fading within 6 frames (19/100ths of a second), and occurs immediately after criticality. The primary thermal radiation from the weapons residues is emitted from the fireball [FIG.16] in two pulses [Fig. 14]. Extremely high temperatures convert to X-rays that are emitted from the fireball [FIG.16], and absorbed within a few feet of air. Secondary thermal radiation (strips 1-4) is re-emitted at a longer wavelength (ultraviolet, visible, and infrared rays).

AA-60 ENTIRE NUCLEAR BLAST - INITIAL 2 PULSES (see FIG. 14), FIREBALL (FIG. 16), AND DIRT CLOUD (FIG. 17).

20150208 _2a. Donetsk Pulse Sequence 05.06-13.06 ANIMATED, output_ffsXSt

2(a) Entire blast from initial first and second pulse to fade away at the end of the blast (8 seconds). ย ย Source: YouTube: https://youtu.be/ZGix83I4nUY; extraction by L.L. Battis (20150208 _2a. Donetsk Pulse Sequence 05.06-13.06 ANIMATED)

AA-60 ENTIRE NUCLEAR BLAST FRAME BY FRAME (every 5th frame was extracted).

20150208 _2. Donetsk Pulse Seq-05.06 -06.06

20150208 _3. Donetsk Pulse Seq-06.11-07.26

20150208 _4. Donetsk Pulse Seq-08.01-09.16

20150208 _5. Donetsk Pulse Seq-09.21-11.06

20150208 _6. Donetsk Pulse Seq-11.11-12.26

FIGURE 18: TOCHKA-U NUCLEAR PHENOMENA OF WARHEAD BLAST.ย Primary and secondary pulses can be seen in the first strip [FIG. 14]. As the fireball gets brighter (strip 2-3), the surface temperatures determine brightness (luminescence) of the fireball, not the total yield (Glasstone p. 27). Radioactive blast cloud [FIG.1] (weapons debris, water vapor, and crater dirt) forms over the fireball (strip 2, and the atmosphere is colored red (primarily phosphorous) from chemicals in the air and radiation interacting (Glasstone p.28). Large amounts of dirt and weapons debris from the blast combine with highly radioactive fission products in the cloud (FIG.1, strips 2-4) creating widespread deadly fallout. As the energy from the blast is dissipated, the fireball fades away (strip 4-5) (Glasstone p.31). ย ย Sources: S. Glasstone, P.J. Dolan: The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, U.S. Army (1977), Pamphlet No. 50-3; YouTube: https://youtu.be/ZGix83I4nUY; L.L. Battis stills (file no. on each photo strip).

In a time lapse of the fireball [FIG. 18], it can be seen as it formed from the extremely hot residues after the TOCHKA-U warhead detonated in the nuclear explosion, and where very high temperatures hotter than the sun are reached. From the hot residue, invisible x-rays are produced and form a highly luminous spherical mass of air and gaseous weapons residue that is visible in [Fig. 15(b)]. The brightness of the fireball (surface temperature) does not change depending on the yield of the warhead, but the brightness decreases with time as a radioactive cloud forms just as this time lapse shows. ย  ย  ย Source: DU bomb: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf1dNieV5q4; Donetsk Tochka-U missile: https://youtu.be/ZGix83I4nUYย OR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGix83I4nUYย 

Backlit trees and buildings are visible in the foreground [FIG. 18], and trees within about 91.4 m (300feet) of the TOCHKA-U crater site were stripped of foliage and snapped off like matchsticks from the shockwave [FIG. 21]. The large crater is 9.1 meters (30 feet) deep and 50 meters (164 feet) wide [FIG. 2(b)], indicating a non-conventional (nuclear) warhead detonation.

BURIAL DEPTH OF THE WARHEAD. The maximum subsurface burial depth for any warhead is limited by the physical integrity (strength) of the warhead casing, that diminishes with depth, and for that reason earth penetrating bombs and warheads cannot penetrate greater than about 9.8 meters (32 ft), the physical limit for the bomb casing. Regardless of the explosive, at that depth the casing can no longer resist the physical forces that have accumulated during burial, and crush the casing containing the warhead explosion mechanism. From the depth 9.1 m (30โ€™) and the width 50 m (165โ€™) of the TOCHKA-U crater, a nuclear warhead is indicated. Because it is a Russia/Soviet design with a selectable yield, it was probably designed to detonate at selectable heights in the air, or depth in the ground.


ENERGY YIELD OF A NUCLEAR WARHEAD


ENERGY RELEASED BY 1 METER BURIAL INCREASES YIELD TEN TIMES: In [FIG. 19], the equivalent yield of a buried explosion compared to an aboveground explosion can be an order of magnitude (10X) greater if the warhead is buried just 1 meter below the surface!ย Consideration of whether the detonation occurred in the air or subsurface is an extremely important factor influencing the yield of a nuclear warhead. Warheads on missiles can be set to detonate in the air, on the ground, or to penetrate the ground surface to a predetermined burial depth.

FIG. 19:The Equivalent Yield Ratio measures the seismic energy generated from a buried explosion compared to that of a surface burst as a function of the scaled depth, Rs= R/W1/3, of the explosion. This scaling results from the variation of peak pressure with distance, P โˆ W/R3, where W is the total energy yield in kilotons. A bomb buried just 1 meter below the surface produces a ground shock more than an order of magnitude greater than an aboveground explosion. ย ย Source: R.W. Nelson, Nuclear Bunker Busters, Mini-Nukes, and the US Nuclear StockpilePhysics Today, (2003). ย  http://pauldavidtuff.com/PDF%20Files/Nuke%20Bunker%20Buster.pdfย 

The measurement of the explosive energy that can be produced by a nuclear weapon is expressed as the โ€œyieldโ€. It is usually expressed as the equivalent amount of TNT (a chemical explosive) in tons that would generate the same amount of energy released by the nuclear device when it explodes. A 1-kiloton nuclear weapon is one that produces the same amount of energy in an explosion that 1 kiloton (1000 tons) of TNT would release from 0.548 cubic meters of TNT. If the yield for the Donetsk nuclear warhead was selected for 10 kt, the equivalent amount of TNT required to release the same amount of energy as the Donetsk nuclear blast, would be 10,000 tons of TNT. The volume of TNT required at (0.548 m3/ton), would be 5,480 cubic meters or 7, 167.6 cubic yards. The fissile core in a nuclear warhead is about the size of an orange.

Research and development to produce miniaturized nuclear warheads of 5 kt or less, for the U.S. nuclear arsenal, publically escalated Ms. Moret observed after about 2000 when Navy Admirals started appearing at University of California Regents meetings. They waved their arms and excitedly announced that the U.S. nuclear weapons program โ€œwas back in businessโ€. Later in the day they visited the Livermore nuclear weapons lab and announced to the employees that โ€œWeโ€™re back in business and weโ€™re making big ones and little ones." In the U.S. the small tactical nukes (5 kt or smaller) are referred to as battlefield tactical nukes. The decision when and how to use them, is made by field officers handling them on the battlefield, without any oversight by higher ups. โ€ฆโ€.

PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL AND NOTICE TO CONGRESS: For nuclear weapons larger than 5 kt, U.S. Presidential approval and notification of Congress are required. Interestingly, nuclear weapons of 5 kt and under do not. Exempt from international war conventions, international law, the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and agreements, tactical battlefield nuclear weapons are under the control of military personnel on the battlefield, yet these are the most lethal, dangerous, and efficient form of nuclear war.

DONBASS DEPOPULATION: The detonation parameters for the Donetsk missile attack were purposely selected for maximum contamination from fallout for the purpose of depopulation. By selection of an air blast that released 1/10th of the yield of one buried a meter, indicates destruction of infrastructure was not the main purpose for using it, and in fact, it may have had a reduced yield selected to hide evidence of a nuclear attack. A larger yield would have created โ€œHiroshima victimsโ€ with prompt symptoms and deaths from acute and widespread radiation exposure [FIG. 22]. If the 10 kt yield had been selected for detonation, and the warhead had been buried 1 meter, the yield would have been 100 kt. For comparison, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were each 20 kt and destroyed large areas of the cities around them [FIG. 22].

In conclusion, from the parameters selected (yield of 10 kt and height of detonation) for the TOCHKA-U nuclear warhead and blast, the primary purpose for firing this nuclear ballistic missile into Donetsk was obviously to terrify and expose the population to lethal fission products, and to permanently contaminate the environment with extremely dangerous nuclear pollution.


CRATER


CRATER GEOMETRY:

FIG. 20: RELATIVE CRATER SIZES AND SHAPES.

Source: S. Glasstone, P.J. Dolan, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Dept. of the Army Pamphlet No. 50-3, (1977), p. 234: Fig. 6.06. https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/www/effects/eonw_6.pdfย 

In surface and underground bursts the fireball or the hot, high-pressure gases from the explosion break through the surface of the earth. Part of the energy released produces the surface crater [FIG. 20], and much of the rest appears as air blast and ground shock. The deeper the blast below the surface, the less air blast and ground shock is produced.

In (b) the crater shape and size of a surface or very low airburst, best represents the Donetsk TOCHKA-U crater. The presence of blast debris that fell back into the crater, and formation of a lip around the crater, is consistent with other evidence indicating a nuclear blast. See comparison of the crater from a TOSHKA-U conventional warhead to the crater from the Donetsk nuclear warhead [FIG. 2(b)].

CRATER LIP: The crater lip in FIG. 2(a) for a TOCHKA-U conventional warhead is about 0.61 meters (2ft) high compared to the crater lip for the Donetsk TOCHKA-U nuclear warhead blast, that is as high as 10โ€™ in some places. Glasstone (p. 235) gives a range of crater diameters for a surface blast: a 1 kt blast will produce a crater with an approximate diameter of 36.6 meters (120ft), and a 100 kt blast will produce a crater diameter of 146.3 meters (480ft).The dimensions of the crater increase with yield but actual values depend on soil characteristics (Glasstone p.233-4).

The width of the Donetsk crater and the height of the crater lip, are both about five times greater for the nuclear warhead blast compared to the conventional warhead. This is further evidence confirming that the large difference in released energy of the Donetsk crater indicates a nuclear blast. Another factor is the size of the crater ejecta or debris [FIG. 2(b), 21], in this case also indicates a Donetsk nuclear blast. If it is difficult or impossible to walk through the rubble, it indicates a more powerful nuclear blast than if it is easy to pass through the rubble (Glasstone).

DAMAGE TO TREES: In a nuclear blast, strong winds are produced with the shock wave, but trees are primarily sensitive to the drag forces from a blast wave. The damage in a blast is similar to a strong steady wind, and by using Glasstoneโ€™s table [Glasstone Table 5.149, p. 225], assessing the degree of damage to the trees (severe, moderate, or light damage), and the nature of the damage, the equivalent steady wind velocity (miles per hour) is given. In examining the condition of the trees around the crater from media video news stories [FIG. 20], their condition at the location of the crater was shocking. A few trees still standing that were closer to the blast, had trunks that had been snapped off like matchsticks about 1.5-3 meters (5-10 ft) off the ground. Nearly all the trees in the blast area were flattened on the ground surrounding the crater for aboutย 91.4 meters (300ft) from the crater, and some appeared to have bark partially stripped from branches. Glasstoneโ€™s table [Table 5.149 p. 225] indicates that the equivalent steady wind velocity was 193-225.3 km/hr (120-140 mph), putting it in the severe damage category, although there are many variables to consider that could influence that estimate.

FIG. 21: SEVERE DAMAGE TO TREES AROUND CRATER LIP INDICATES NUKE.

Image #21. (top set) 20150209 Pic 1. (l) TREES, CRATER- (r) [In crater looking down from cam location, NUKE EXPLOSION IN UKRAINE? - A Huge Explosion Rocks Eastern Ukraine
Image #21. (bottom) 20150209 Pic 9. [in crater looking up] TREES, CRATER- NUKE EXPLOSION IN UKRAINE? - A Huge Explosion Rocks Eastern Ukraine

Nearly all the trees within 91.4 meters (300ft) of the crater were flattened on the ground and stripped of leaves and branches. Trees that were still standing were snapped off at the trunk. ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย ย Source:โ€œTochka-U Missile Attackโ€, Channel 24 (RU), Feb. 9, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C8GV63mnBU; http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.com/2014/10/donetsk-hit-by-tochka-u.htmlย 

In Glasstoneโ€™s diagram on โ€œDamage-distance relationships for drag-sensitive targetsโ€ [Figure 5.146 (p. 223)], the severe tree damage indicates a yield of about 10 kt for the TOCHKA-U nuclear warhead. That is the lower limit for selectable yield on the AA-60 nuclear warhead. ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย ย 


SHOCK WAVE


FIG. 22: HIROSHIMA 20 KT ATOMIC BOMB SHOCK WAVE EFFECTS. The large amount of energy in the shock wave from the mid-altitude air detonation of the Hiroshima atomic bomb flattened the city and destroyed nearly everything in site for a large distance. Final death estimate was 135,000 people killed. Under the right conditions this could have happened to Donetsk if the 20 kt yield nuclear warhead option had been selected by Ukrainian govt. troops who fired it into Donetsk. The photo is signed by Col. Paul W. Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay that dropped the first atomic bomb on a human population. ย ย Source: A. Glaser, โ€œEffects of Nuclear Weaponsโ€, Lecture, Princeton Univ., Feb. 12, 2007. https://www.princeton.edu/~aglaser/lecture2007_weaponeffects.pdfย 

RAPID RELEASE OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF ENERGY IN A LIMITED SPACE: Explosions in general result from a very rapid release of a large amount of energy in a limited space. This applies to conventional and nuclear explosions, but occurs in different ways. A considerable increase in temperature and pressure occurs resulting in conversion of the materials involved into hot, compressed gases. Because these gases are extremely hot, they expand quickly and produce a pressure wave or โ€œshock waveโ€ whether it is in air, water, or earth. A shock wave in air is called a โ€œblast wave.โ€ Ideally there is a great deal of pressure at the front, and a gradual decrease behind it, and the shock wave is accompanied by a very strong wind [FIG. 21].

For both conventional and nuclear weapons, the shock or blast wave causes destructive action. However nuclear explosions can be thousands or even millions of times more powerful than conventional detonations. Because conventional detonations are weaker, the amount of material needed to cause an equivalent release of energy as a nuclear blast, requires much greater amounts of conventional explosives (but without the deadly legacy of fission products). Another difference is that nuclear events release light and heat, or thermal radiation that cause skin burns and fires starting at long distances. In the release of nuclear energy from a detonation, the โ€œinitial nuclear radiationโ€ is released as very dangerous and penetrating x-rays, followed by release of the โ€œresidual nuclear radiationโ€ in the form of radioactive materials (fission products) that are active over an extended period of time, as for example, fallout.

KIEV ATO BATALLION OBSERVERS POSITIONED IN ADVANCE TO FILM TOCHKA-U BLAST: Apparently โ€œobserversโ€ from the ATO pro-Ukrainian govt. battalion had been notified in advance [FIG. 18(2a)] of the TOCHKA-U launch, and were positioned and ready to film the detonation with a cellphone. This is a further indication that the Kiev Junta and Ukrainian pro-government troops are responsible for the missile attack in Donetsk on Feb. 8, 2015. ย VIDEO: T. Durden, โ€œMeanwhile In Donetsk...โ€, Feb. 8, 2014. ย http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-08/meanwhile-donetskย 

The distance between the detonation and the observers was 5 km (3.1 miles). This was determined by counting the seconds from the detonation to the time when the shock wave arrived at their location 15 seconds later, and then multiplying the seconds by the speed of sound [speed of sound: 339 m./sec. (1100 ft/sec), or 4.72933086 sec. per mile] to estimate their distance from the blast as 5 km (3.1 miles). When the shock wave arrived, it knocked the cameraman onto the ground and broke glass windows in the apartment from the after-pressure, and for more than 5 km (3.1 miles) from the blast.

SECURITY CAM RECORDING SHOWS DOUBLE PULSE AND SOUND OF POWERFUL SHOCK WAVE.

Another recording of the double-pulse and shock wave was made from a security camera located 17.5 seconds, or 5.8km (3.6 miles), from the detonation. The energy and force of the shock wave, even that far from the blast, was very powerful.ย Source:ย ะ’ะทั€ั‹ะฒะฝะฐั ะฒะพะปะฝะฐ ะฒ ะ”ะพะฝะตั†ะบะต 8 ั„ะตะฒั€ะฐะปั 2015 ะณ. "Wave explosive in Donetsk," ย ย https://youtu.be/voh-Nh62AZY

SEISMIC INDICATOR: The detonation was felt 30 km (18.6 miles) from the blast site. The explosion was strong enough to leave a seismic indicator in official earthquake records that would indicate the yield of the blast. It was not reported in the U.S.G.S. seismic event record, but may be present in government data from Russia, Ukraine, or Belarus.

FALLOUT

HIGHEST LEVEL OF NUCLEAR CONTAMINATION: The selection of conditions of the detonation of the Donetsk TOCHKA-U nuclear warhead, described above in โ€œConditions of Detonationโ€, clearly caused the highest level of nuclear contamination in the dirt cloud and in the base surge from the Donetsk nuclear blast.

This issue is probably the most important one to consider in terms of the extent of fallout contamination in the Donbass region, because it will affect the health and welfare of many people from initial exposure and from contamination of the environment.

EARLY FALLOUT FRACTION, FALLOUT PATTERN, PARTICLE SIZE: The fallout and radiation danger is very high for detonations below 2900โ€™ (in air or very shallow) as is the case for the Donetsk blast [Glasstone p. 71]. The early fallout fraction that reaches the ground for a surface burst is 40-70% in one day. The fallout pattern is difficult to predict because it depends on terrain, meteorological conditions, yield of the warhead, height of the blast, and other variables. For the TOCHKA-U blast in Donetsk, if the winds were light or still, it would have produced a more-or-less circular pattern of fallout. Winds would tend to shape and elongate the fallout pattern.

NANOPARTICLES: Fission products and other radioactive debris from the warhead, condense from a gas or plasma in the dirt cloud, onto solid and molten soil minerals in the particle size range of 0.001-1mm. They reach very high temperatures in the fireball, and form an extremely large number of thin walled hollow nanoparticles with an extremely high surface to volume ratio that increases toxicity by orders of magnitude. The submicroscopic particles stay suspended in the atmosphere until they are rained or snowed out, if they are not incorporated in the dirt and debris of the fireball cloud. Larger particles of dust from fallout are remobilized from the battlefield by atmospheric convection, fires, human and animal activities that stir up the dirt, and seasonal changes.

Image #23 Depleted Uranium Hollow Spherical Particulates (l) and Hot Particle Alpha Tracks in Lung Tissue (r)

FIG. 23: Depleted Uranium Particles, and Plutonium Hot Particle Alpha Tracks in Lung Tissue. Under the right conditions cancer can start from one alpha particle.(L) Photomicrograph (X 1000) of depleted uranium hollow spherical particles formed at high temperatures in battlefield weapons (1979). (R) Lawrence Radiation Laboratory 1982: Particle of Plutonium-239 magnified 500X, in lung tissue of an ape; black star shape in center is alpha tracks emitted in 48 hours. Both Uranium and Plutonium are alpha emitters, and can damage many cells in the range of one alpha particle. ย ย Source: J.A GLISSMEYER et al., โ€œCharacterization Of Airborne Uranium From Test Firings Of XM774 Ammunitionโ€, Prepared for the U.S. Army under U.S. Department of Energy Contract EY-76-C-06-1830, Pacific Northwest Laboratory November 1979 1nov79: Fig. 27 p. 54. http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/Airborne-Uranium-Glissmeyer1nov79.htm; Image of ape lung tissue: R. Del Tredici, At Work In The Fields Of The Bomb (Harper and Row, 1987).

NANOPARTICLE TOXICITY: Hollow radioactive nanoparticles are extremely toxic for three reasons: chemical toxicity, radioactive toxicity, and particulate toxicity as non-specific enzymes or catalysts. Nanoparticle toxicity is the most biologically damaging. In the fission process during detonation of the warhead, fragmentation (tearing apart of the plutonium atoms) of the fissile material (either plutonium or uranium) produces nearly 2000 radioactive isotopes that are incorporated as fission products into the dust cloud, and land on the ground or in bodies of water. They contaminate food, water, and air, and can easily pass through the skin.

STERNGLASS: IMPACTS OF BOMB TESTS ON OCEAN FISHING CATCH: ย Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass, a science advisor to President John F. Kennedy during the period of open air testing (1952-1963), was very influential by presenting scientific evidence supporting President Kennedyโ€™s concern about American children dying from radiation poisoning produced by the bomb tests. President Kennedyโ€™s effort to end U.S, Russian, and British open air testing was successful with the ratification and signing of the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT). This paper by Sternglass proved in the 1970โ€™s that when nuclear bomb tests ended, the fishing catch in the Atlantic was able to fully recover (over-recover) in 3 years from a 50% decline during 7 years of bomb tests [FIG. 24a]. The North Pacific fishing catch declined 65% by 1963ย [FIG. 24b], but never recovered when bomb testing ended, because of continued testing by non-PTBT States.

SEE: E.J. Sternglass, โ€œFallout and Reproduction of Ocean Fish Populationsโ€ (1971). ย http://LeurenMoret.info/Waves/fallout-and-reproduction-of.htmlย 

The research by Dr. Sternglass is a very important and powerful message to humanity that when the radiation is turned off from nuclear weapons, nuclear power, and other nuclear technologies, life can go on. Nuclear technologies are incompatible with living systems.

DECLINE IN FISHING CATCH: Eight years after the PTBT went into effect, Dr. Sternglass wrote his very important unpublished paper โ€œFallout and Reproduction of Ocean Fish Populationsโ€ (1971), on the effects of open air testing, causing a large decline in the fishing catch in the north Pacific and north Atlantic oceans during testing. Although the paper is about the effects of fresh fission products on fish, it has the same toxic effects on other biological systems including humans. Because human beings are more sensitive to radiation exposure than many other species, his paper provides a way to make a conservative quantitative estimate of the biological damage of fission products on humans.

ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  (a) ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย (b)

FIG. 24: DECLINE IN FISHING CATCH 1955-1963 FROM NUCLEAR BOMB TESTS. ย (a) The 50% decline in Atlantic fishing catch inversely correlates (dose response) with Strontium-90 levels (from nuclear bomb tests) in Norwegian milk. The fishing catch over recovered after the testing ended in 1963. (b) The Pacific fishing catch declined 65%, but never recovered after 1963 due to continued testing by China, India, Pakistan, and France. The Fukushima disaster can be expected to cause a much greater decline approaching extinction of many species in the oceans and on land. ย ย Source: E. J. Sternglass, โ€œFallout and Reproduction of Ocean Fish Populationsโ€ (1971). http://LeurenMoret.info/Waves/fallout-and-reproduction-of.htmlย 

Dr. Sternglass was able to estimate that only 250 Curies of Strontium-90 and associated fresh fission products from a nuclear test, led to a 1% decline in the California fishing catch in the Pacific. He estimated that 1 kiloton of fission energy produced 0.1 kilo Curies of Sr-90, a 1% reduction of the fish population for every 2.5 kilotons equivalent of fresh fission products released into the ocean. This amount is 2000 times less than the total yield from an anti-ballistic missile such as the โ€œCanikinโ€ warhead (5mt), and some warheads in torpedos such as the Mark 45 (11kt).

Dr. Sternglass concluded that:

Thus, although a leak into the fishing grounds of the North Pacific is regarded as unlikely, the consequences of even a small escape of radioactivity localized as it would necessarily be, unlike in the case of an upper stratospheric detonation of such a warhead, could be of disastrous consequences both for the fishing industry and the fish and wildlife of the entire Northern Pacific.

How propheticโ€ฆ when one thinks of the impact of Fukushima on the oceans.

STERNGLASS ESTIMATE OF DOSE RESPONSE: Dr. Sternglass has presented a valuable constant and method for estimating the percent reduction in a living population per kiloton of fresh fission products, produced by a nuclear detonation that represents a dose response. For the depopulation agenda aggressors, it is simply a โ€œkill rateโ€ with a desired endpoint of population reduction. In fact Dick Cheney periodically sent people to Iraq and later to Palestine to collect soil samples after the U.S./Israel used lethal weapons on civilians, and by monitoring the deaths, he was able to determine the kill rate. Cheney was able to adjust the application of lethal weapons until the endpoint of desired population reduction was reached in increments. The U.S. will continue sending lethal weapons intended to reduce numbers in targeted populations. The situation in the war zone of eastern Ukraine is no different and has been escalated by oligarch Kolimoisky bribing U.S. politicians with a vested interest in mineral resources in the war zone.

If the Donetsk TOCHKA-U was armed with a 10 kt nuclear warhead, under the right conditions, it could cause as much as a 4% decline in population in the Donbass region. Fortunately many people left the area after the war started. The long term effects are rarely mentioned in assessing biological effects of nuclear exposure, yet there has to be extensive research on the dose-response, since this has been studied carefully by the military and other governmental and non-governmental entities since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the U.S. military as well as other governments are still studying those populations for long-term radiation effects. It is the sole reason in fact, for miniaturizing nuclear weapons โ€“ to use on populations where there are minerals to exploit.

JESUIT GENOCIDE โ€“ SCORCHED EARTH POLICY OF STRONG NATIONS:

ย It is undeniable that a nuclear genocide and scorched earth policy in eastern Ukraine is being carried out on Russian speaking Eastern Orthodox Christians. This is not a war between two opposing armies, but a blatant Jesuit genocide of an ethnic religious group of civilians who refused to submit to the Pope of Rome, carried out under the guise of a โ€œcivil warโ€. It is an extinction event of a Russian speaking population with valuable resources and freedom of religion that is opposed by powerful and ancient Iranian bloodline global forces โ€“ presently rebranded as the Jesuits. This infamous military organization wants control of the rich agricultural land and mineral resources of Ukraine. This is part of a Jesuit โ€œclever schemeโ€ to create one world religion they control under the Pope of Rome, and one world government in order for them to dominate the planet.


FIG. 24b: JESUIT GENOCIDE IN SERBIA AND UKRAINE OF EASTERN ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS:ย (Top map) Serbia has been a Christian country since the conversion of Serbs in the 9th Century by Byzantine Christian Missionaries. It predominately follows Eastern Orthodoxy of the Serbian Orthodox Church. ย There are over 6 million Orthodox Christians in Serbia (dark blue on map), making up over 85% of the population, compared to 4.97% Roman Catholics who represent the next largest religious group in Serbia. ย The US/NATO wars in former Yugoslavia were geopolitically related to oil and pipelines, but a deeper hidden purpose were Jesuit religious wars to genocide the Serbian Orthodox Christians. ย This was a repeat of the Bolsheviks who killed nearly 100 million White Russians, also Eastern Orthodox Christians. ย By permanently poisoning the land and targeted populations, widespread carpet bombing in the war zones of Serbia and other parts of Yugoslavia were contaminated permanently by depleted uranium weapons (some containing the lethal cancer agent, D.I.M.E.), nuclear missiles, and very likely 4th generation nuclear weapons as the decline in IQ [FIG. 5a] in the war zones indicates. ย Following two Soros colored revolutions that promised a myth of U.S. style democracy, clearly the Orthodox Christians in Serbia and now in Yugoslavia were targeted populations. (Bottom map) Ukraine is primarily composed of 8 million Russian speaking Russian Eastern Orthodox Christians in the south and east, and transitions west across the country to a predominantly Ukrainian speaking population of Ukrainian Orthodox Christians under the Pope. Because it was difficult to find a map of Ukraine by religion, the map of Ukraine by majority language was used. ย The Russian speakers are concentrated in Novorussia, a term used to identify the region from the border with Moldova through the southern part of Ukraine, including Odessa and Crimea, and along the eastern and northern border with Russia. ย Like Serbia, the present conflict is a geopolitical war for pipelines and oil/gas, but beneath that cover story it is just as much a Jesuit genocide of the Russian Orthodox Christians in Ukraine. ย The focus of the Ukrainian government troops from the start of the conflict has been to destroy the civilian infrastructure and kill as many civilians as possible.ย ย ย SOURCE:ย Map of Serbia:ย http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/16/Serbia-Religion-2002.gifย ย Map of Ukraine: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ukraine_Majority_Language_Map_2001.png

The tremendous debt now owed to the IMF and World Bank by the Ukraine since the Orange Revolution, will be used by the IMF to force the trade of โ€œNature for debtโ€ (trade the debt of nation States to the IMF for their commons - the land and mineral wealth). The IMF will then sell the entire land in the Ukraine to the Jesuits through Jesuit-owned Monsanto and Cargill. The clean food basket of Europe will be converted to GMO crops that will poison Europe and escalate the death rate and collapse of the EU. Recently President Obama traded the water of Lake Superior to China under the โ€œNature for debtโ€ scheme, another example of the โ€œJesuit Minuetโ€ of the looting and takedown of strong nations like America for the benefit of a hidden few.

ESTIMATION OF DONETSK TOCHKA-U NUCLEAR YIELD

GLOBAL NUCLEAR KABUKI THEATER: The Soviet-era TOCHKA-U short-range ballistic missile, with a nuclear warhead option and selectable yield (10-100 kt), is a legacy from the Cold War and the โ€œnuclear threatโ€ that was created for public consumption to justify atmospheric testing and the production of higher yield nuclear weapons. Of course high yield warheads were impractical because they assured mutual destruction of the parties in conflict, caused deaths and illnesses in the military personnel using them, and permanently contaminated terrain causing denial of access due to nuclear contamination. The most important purpose for atmospheric testing was covert and top secret: under cover of the Cold War, โ€œbitter enemiesโ€ Russia and the US secretly, and jointly conducted research on the ionosphere by injecting nuclear pollution from high altitude tests into the Van Allen belt (the earthโ€™s magnetic field). Research on the science of the ionosphere and how it works, was necessary before it was possible to covertly co-develop HAARP and its applications as a global energy weapon. Now fully operational, HAARP is the most elaborate and destructive global weapon system ever developed. ย ย 

SEE: G. MacDonald, โ€œHow to Wreck the Environmentโ€, Unless Peace Comes: A Scientific Forecast of New Weapons, Viking Adult (1968), pp. 181-205 ย https://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/1968-macdonald-how-to-wreck-the-planet.pdf

โ€œHow to Wreck the Environmentโ€ is a description of HAARP by Dr. Gordon MacDonald, a geophysicist and Jason scientist at U.C.L.A., who developed the HAARP tectonic warfare application. HAARP is the cause of the Fukushima earthquake and tsunamiโ€ฆ that poisoned the world permanently with the most pernicious poison in existence.

In order to hide the danger of nuclear pollution and protect the military, a global fiction was created around the Cold War nuclear weapons project. With the false promise of โ€œminimal collateralโ€ damage, it was acted out on the world stage as โ€œGlobal Nuclear Kabuki Theaterโ€. This was carefully staged to hide the dark depopulation agenda behind miniaturization of nuclear weapons.

The goal of minimal collateral damage falls squarely in the wishful-thinking category.

Robert W. Nelson, โ€œNuclear Bunker Busters, Mini-Nukes, and theย US Nuclear Stockpileโ€, Physics Today (November 2003): p.32. ย ย Source: http://pauldavidtuff.com/PDF%20Files/Nuke%20Bunker%20Buster.pdfย 

When the PTBT ended open air testing in 1963, research immediately began on a new generation of low-yield nuclear weapons of 5 kt and under, but not everyone agreed that it was a good idea.

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ

International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq (Kuala Lumpur)

War Crimes Complaint, November 5, 2010,

By Leuren Moret, p.61-62.

In the past decades the greatest pressure has come from the nuclear weapons establishment for development of new and/or modified nuclear weapons, with lower yields to lessen dangerous nuclear fallout, and larger yields to attack deeply buried targets.ย Out of concern that a new generation of low-yield nuclear weapons would be developed, because nuclear weapons under 5 kt are not included in the NPT, a US law was passed in 1994 prohibiting research and development of nuclear weapons of less than 5 kilotons.ย Many scientists have urgently warned of the environmental hazards and dangers of low yield nuclear weapons, and ofย their danger as extreme radioactive terrain contaminants. But their warnings also exposed a hidden agenda - that low-yield nuclear weapons were intended for third-world conflicts.


In other words, the official US position since 2002, when President George W. Bush (backed by the Neo-Cons) presented his Nuclear Posture Review, is that in conventional conflicts with third-world countries, any and all non-nuclear states who are prevented from developing or using nuclear weapons by the NPT, could be attacked, in violation of the NPT by the US (and coalition forces), with a new class of low-yield nuclear weapons that are clearly Weapons of Mass Destruction and illegal. But what a preposterous position for a nuclear super power to take, while bullying 170 non-nuclear states into indefinitely renewing the NPT.


The nuclear super powers can never be trusted by non-nuclear States.

โŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏโŽฏ


SCIENTIFIC PHENOMENA CONSISTENT WITH A 10 KT NUCLEAR BLAST

GLASSTONE ESTIMATION OF YIELD:

For yields below about 20 kt, the radius of the stem of the mushroom cloud is about half the cloud radius.ย As the kt increases and releases more energy, the height of the mushroom cloud increases but width of the stem decreases to only 1/5 to 1/10 as wide as the cloud. (p.32)

A typical cloud from a 10-kiloton air burst would reach a height of 19,000 feet with the base at about 10,000 feet; the horizontal extent would also be roughly 10,000 feet.ย For an explosion in the megaton range, however, the horizontal dimensions are greater than the total height (cf. Fig. 2.16). (p.33)

S. Glasstone and P.J. Dolan, THE EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS (1977)

RATIO OF WIDTH OF CLOUD TO WIDTH OF CLOUD STEM: For a 10 kt. blast Glasstone has described the relative dimensions of the cloud to be about twice the width of the stem of the mushroom cloud. In [FIG. 1], the cloud and stem of the mushroom cloud appear to meet the Glasstone parameters of a nuclear warhead with a 10 kt. yield.

DETONATION: This is irrefutable evidence that the TOCHKA-U was carrying a nuclear warhead, the AA-60. In the video clip of the detonation of the Donetsk TOSKA-U warhead [FIG. 18], the formation of the fireball appeared to be preceded by two very rapid pulses [FIG. 14, 18(1a)] that are a physical characteristic of an airburst nuclear detonation [FIG. 15(b)]. The double pulse phenomena is characteristic of nuclear blasts in the air or close to the ground. It does not occur for underground blasts.

FIREBALL: In [FIG. 15(b)] the fireball and cloud have formed [FIG. 18], and the intense white light being emitted is characteristic of extremely high temperatures reached in a nuclear blast.

TIME LAPSE SEQUENCE OF SCIENTIFIC PHENOMENA: In [FIG. 18], the time lapse from the detonation, two pulses [FIG. 18(1a)], and blast of the TOCHKA-U warhead occurs and fades out in about a minute [FIG. 18(1b)]. This is a sequence of physical events characteristic of a nuclear detonation.

ENERGY YIELD OF AN AIRBURST: In addition to the dimensions of the mushroom cloud, the energy yield of the warhead can be estimated by the size and dimensions of the crater [FIG. 2(b), 20], damage to structures and trees [FIG. 21] in the area surrounding the crater, and the size of the ejecta and blast debris [FIG. 21] that fall back into the crater.

In [FIG. 2(b), 20] the dimensions of the craters and height of the lip of the craters, formed by a TOCHKA-U conventional warhead compared to a TOCHKA-U nuclear warhead, is conclusive evidence that the Donetsk missile blast was nuclear and was most likely from a TOCHKA-U AA-60 nuclear warhead. The Donetsk crater was five times wider, with a lip five times higher, and twice as deep as the crater from the conventional warhead [FIG. 2(b)]. Damage to trees [FIG. 21] around the crater was severe, but damage to structures has not been reported such as at the chemical plant 0.6 miles away from the crater site. Broken glass was reported at least as far as 3.1 miles from the blast where an alleged ATO observer was filming the missile attack, and was knocked down by the shock wave that also broke the windows in his location.

VIDEO: โ€œDonetsk Tochka-U missile explosionโ€, filmed in Donetsk by ATO observers, Feb. 8, 2015. ย https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGix83I4nUYย 

The size of the crater, damage limited to trees and windows, and minimal damage reported to structures indicates an airburst detonation of about 10 kt. The yield could have been 100 kt or ten times greater if the warhead had been buried 1 meter [FIG. 19], and would have caused extensive damage over a greater area [see Hiroshima damage for an airburst 20 kt warhead FIG. 22]. In Donbass, citizens reported feeling the blast as far away as 30 km (18.6 miles), indicating a very energetic nuclear detonation not physically possible for a TOCHKA-U conventional warhead explosion. The double pulse visible in the Donetsk airburst would not have been visible for a buried warhead.

SHOCKWAVE: Evidence of the shockwave from the blast, came from widespread reports of broken windows in Donetsk. The shockwave can actually be heard 3.1 miles from the detonation in the video made by an alleged ATO observer filming the missile strike at 10:50 PM on the night of Feb. 8, 2015. After the detonation and disappearance of the fireball within a minute, there is a time delay in darkness of about 15 seconds, before the shockwave hits the location of the observer. Suddenly the windows break as the videographer is violently thrown onto the floor.ย 

SEE: SECURITY CAM RECORDING SHOWS DOUBLE PULSE AND SOUND OF POWERFUL SHOCK WAVE. ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย ย https://youtu.be/voh-Nh62AZYย 

The shockwave was reported 30 km (18.6 miles) from the detonation in the Kuibyshevsky district of Donetsk [FIG. 2(a)], indicating that a large release of energy was enough to produce a shockwave that traveled such a long distance. The damage from the 10 kt Donetsk missile strike, clearly does not compare to the devastation in an image of the aftermath of the 20 kt. atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 [FIG. 22]. The Hiroshima bomb detonated in an airburst at 600 m (1969 feet), and flattened much of the city. There should be a fingerprint of the Donetsk nuclear missile strike in the official seismic history in government records.

FALLOUT: A glaring omission in the evidence and analysis reported by officials on the Donetsk nuclear missile strike, is any mention of radioactive contamination that occurred as a result of the nuclear warhead airburst. For the 2.3 kt Cabriolet underground nuclear test in 1968, the highly radioactive base surge reached 2.5 miles in all directions from the blast, and produced a highly radioactive relatively small smoke column, not a mushroom cloud. The lower limit for the AA-60 warhead yield is more than four times greater. Nuclear blasts like the Cabriolet test of 5 kt and under do not produce a mushroom cloud like detonations over 5 kt. If the Donetsk missile warhead was nuclear, and there is plenty of evidence that it was, then highly radioactive materials were released in the base surge, and in fallout falling from the mushroom cloud over a larger area.

Therefore if the Donetsk missile was armed with a nuclear warhead, there has to be measurable levels of highly radioactive fission and neutron activation products in the environment and region where the strike occurred. Since nuclear events are politicized and underreported, it is likely that a deliberate coverup of nuclear contamination, and admission that the missile was armed with a nuclear warhead, has occurred to hide the danger of exposure from the public.

A nuclear coverup in Ukraine has already occurred since late November 2014, when two explosions in a reactor at Zaporhyzne nuclear plant occurred. Low levels of fallout were first publicly reported from the Zaporhyzne explosions on Nov. 27, in Latvia from official government monitoring data [FIG. 26 โ€BALDONEโ€]. Several days later government monitoring reports indicated very high levels of radiation in Greece [FIG. 27], where it was officially reported for 3 days and nights before governments stopped reporting radiation levels. In Latvia, after air monitoring in Greece reported very high levels of radiation, the Latvian government data for peak levels of radiation was removed from the official record reported to the public, and data had obviously been removed from blank spaces on the graph where sharp peaks had been when first reported. Right after the explosions at Zaporhyzne, Russian scientists predicted that radioactive releases could be as high as Chernobyl releases, but that lower releases hopefully would occur. They also predicted more reactor explosions [ed- more occurred on December 28, and 30], with radiation releases in Ukraine because of the instability of the Kiev Junta under CIA influence, and the general deterioration of the situation.

STERNGLASS DOSE RESPONSE: He calculated that for every 2.5 kt of fission products released from atmospheric tests, a 1% decline in fishing catch occurred. In his research on the decline of fishing catch in the north Pacific Ocean [using State of California data] and the north Atlantic [using Norwegian govt. data], Dr. Sternglass provided a very important, and probably the first, dose response publicly reported for ocean fish populations exposed to bomb test rainout. Rainout occurs for nano-particulates too small for gravitational forces to remove from the atmosphere as fallout. The calculation could be used as an estimate in human populations since humans tend to be more sensitive to radiation effects than many animals. More importantly, this indicates very low levels of fresh fission products from surface detonations, diluted by a large volume of water or air, are even more dangerous to biological systems than atmospheric and underground blasts. Clearly, low yield nuclear devices were designed for use as depopulation agents. The Ukraine govt. troops launched the missile from a distance using GPS coordinates for the intended target, after positioning ATO observers 3.1 miles away to film it. The target was never the chemical plant (empty for 2 years) as disinformation, widely reported in the media and โ€œblamed on a cigarette buttโ€. The missile detonated in an isolated forested area close to midnight, where it would do minimal damage and left only a very large crater. The big question is what happened to the fission products?


Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men.

Martin Luther King, Jr.


The new form of warfare includes mini-nukes and low yield warheads used on battlefields and in densely populated regions in third world countries, designed to be efficient mechanisms for reducing populations with nuclear pollution from fallout and rainout of fresh fission products. In modern warfare, where valuable mineral deposits are located, existing populations have to be moved or destroyed. Genocide of populations is cheaper and more efficient in many ways than the cost of relocation, therefore providing militaries with mini-nukes and low-yield warheads is ideal for disposing of targeted populations.


UKRAINE - THE GRAVE DANGER OF THREE CHERNOBYLS


2004 ORANGE REVOLUTION LEGACY: Due to the recent destabilization of Ukraine by the United States, that began with the George Soros sponsored Orange Revolution in 2004,ย Russian Professor Vladimir Kuznetsov and State Duma Deputy Maxim Shingarkin have recently assessed Ukraine as a new global nuclear threat. They have warned about the special danger of three aspects of atomic energy in Ukraine: storage of spent nuclear fuel; the presence of the radiation of the Chernobyl zone; and Pridneprovsky chemical plant, located in Dneprodzerzhinsk. Forty two million tons of nuclear waste in 9 unguarded storage facilities at Pridneprovsky, a Soviet era uranium extraction facility, is an attractive nuisance for nuclear terrorism. Following the 2014 coup in Ukraine, and the replacement of Pres. Yanukovich by the CIA illegal Kiev Junta, Ukraine engaged withย the most dangerous nuclear theater in its history.

MARCH 2014 YATSENYUKโ€™S CIA/SCIENTOLOGY/JESUIT LEGACY โ€“ย โ€˜CHERNOBYL CONTRACTโ€™, SCYTHIAN GOLD HEIST, AND โ€˜NATURE FOR DEBTโ€™: And so the road to another "Chernobyl" contract, for the supply of fuel by Westinghouse, for three nuclear power units of Ukrainian NPPs, has been arranged by Prime Minister Yatsenyuk. Among many thefts he has carried out, within a week of the coup in Ukraine in February 2014, P.M. Yatsenyuk secretly arranged for US special ops to remove 40 tons of ancient Scythian gold treasures from Kiev, and deposit it in JP Morgan bank in New York City as a guarantee on an IMF loan. Founded by Jesuits, Scientology gives Yatsenyuk direct ties to the Jesuits who control banking through the Vatican Bank and Rothschilds. Yatsenyuk is a global NWO player.

page 44 Scythian gold dogs

"Ukraine and Crimeaโ€™s Vanishing Goldโ€, by J. Goss, ย NewsJunkiePost.com, July 30, 2014. ย ย http://newsjunkiepost.com/2014/07/30/ukraine-and-crimeas-vanishing-gold/ย 

He traded the national gold treasure for US promises to arrange a large IMF loan, that bankrupted Ukraine in one year. Ties to the Jesuits through his Scientology membership expose Yatsenyuk as a very dangerous NWO player. Jesuit owned companies Monsanto and Cargill, plan to buy all of the land in Ukraine from the IMF once the Ukraine is forced by the IMF to โ€œtrade Nature for debt.โ€

Video: โ€œUkraine will have to sell all its land to western company Monsanto for repayment to IMFโ€, ย  ย Source: โ€˜Roundup of Novorossia for March 05-06โ€: Voice of Sevastopol, March 7, 2015. http://en.voicesevas.ru/news/yugo-vostok/3575-roundup-of-novorossia-for-march-05-06.htmlย 

Monsanto and Cargill are already growing GMO food in Ukraine, until now a GMO-free region that fed GMO-free Europe and Russia.

MARCH 2011 - FUKUSHIMA PLUTONIUM EFFECT - A PULSING NEUTRON BOMB THAT CANNOT BE TURNED OFF: The Fukushima Plutonium effect transformed the melted MOX fuel into a pulsing neutron bomb that cannot be turned off. A far greater danger is not mentioned, because it remains a hidden unknown nuclear consequence of the extreme conditions of the Fukushima disaster in 2011. Ukrainian scientists discovered that when Fukushima reactor 3 overheated, it had been loaded with MOX fuel that melted when the earthquake damaged the cooling system. The โ€œFukushima Plutonium effectโ€ is now described as a cycle of Plutonium fission events, causing large blow-ups, followed by extremely energetic neutron pulses that travel over 200 miles in every direction. The neutron pulsing at Fukushima caused damage to three other nuclear power plants within 200 miles. Westinghouse and GE (secretly owned by the Rockefellers) purposely set up the โ€œFukushima experimentโ€ with corruption and bribery, evading oversight, laws, and safety protocols that would have prevented the global disaster. Every reactor in the world now is a potential eternally pulsing neutron bomb. A scientific paper about it was published in 2013:

โ€œFukushima Plutonium Effect and Blow-Up Regimes in Neutron- Multiplying Media,โ€ by V.D. Rusov et al., World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology (2013): p.9. ย  ย  ย ย Source: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.0648.pdfย 

MAY 2014 โ€“ย UKRAINIANS PLAY RUSSIAN ROULETTE - SOVIET NUKE PLANTS + WESTINGHOUSE MOX FUEL:ย With four Ukrainian Soviet-era NPPs [FIG. 25] that have a total of 15 nuclear reactors scheduled for Westinghouse fuel, the Ukraine government has started the extremely dangerous replacement of Soviet designed fuel rods with Westinghouse fuel, in Soviet-era nuclear power plants. A former Goldman Sachs banker and US asset, Prime Minister Yatsenyuk had to first fire top nuclear officials, the Chairman of the State Nuclear Regulatory Committee of Ukraine and the Chief Inspector of Nuclear and Radiation Safety (SCNS), who had prevented Westinghouse fuel in Ukraine because of safety issues. A new contract with Westinghouse, arranged by Yatsenyuk in late December 2014, points out the politicization of a purely technical question, given the dangerous experience already demonstrated by the use of Westinghouse fuel in Soviet/Russian VVER-type reactors in Finland, Czech Republic and Ukraine.

Kuznetsov and Shingarkin have made a strong warning against the nuclear threat of more Chernobyls in Ukraine in their recent article, โ€œThree nuclear bombs - Ukraineโ€, May 27, 2014:

Replacement of Russian nuclear fuel with Westinghouse fuel, is explosive under the leadership of Ukraine. โ€œEurope is threatened by three new Chernobylsโ€ is the expert evaluation of Professor Vladimir Kuznetsov of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University and M. C. University, and State Duma Deputy and ecologist Maxim Shingarkin, a Russian social activist, human rights activist, ecologist, expert in radiation, and environmental and industrial safety.

Source: V. Kuznetsov and M. Shingarkin, โ€œThree nuclear bombs Ukraineโ€, FLN.ru, May 27, 2014. English: https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2014/12/07/those-westinghouse-rods-wont-even-fit-properly-theyre-square-vs-hexagonal; and in Russian: http://flb.ru/info/57871.html

NOV. 21, 2014 YATSENYUK SIGNS WESTINGHOUSE โ€œCHERNOBYL CONTRACTโ€: On November 21, 2014, just a week before two large explosions at Zaporhyzne NPP in a reactor burning Westinghouse fuel, the head of โ€œRosatomโ€ Sergey Kiriyenko stated in RIA Novosti, that Russia had signed a contract with Ukraine to supply nuclear fuel for 2015.

By its parameters and characteristics the Westinghouse fuel is not suitable for Ukrainian NPPs, it is confirmed by a failed experiment that could end in another Chernobyl. Its ore Ukraine enough, but to enrich it to the desired condition only on the Russian centrifuges. It seems that the Chinese tried to copy the Russian centrifuge exploded. Not to mention the fact that the fuel assemblies (FA) in the Russian reactors have a hexagonal cross- section, and FA foreign reactors โ€“ square. The sizes are the same, but the form no. Square in hex to get problematic.

Source: โ€œRussia signed a contract with Ukraine for the supply of nuclear fuel for 2015โ€, ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย (RU)_http://z5h64q92x9.net/tr-url/ru-en.en/russian.rt.com/article/60676; (EN)_https://niqnaq.u.com/2014/11/21/anything-to-avoid-that-pindosi-fuel-it-would-have-blown-them-up/ย 

But, earlier it was reported that the Ukraine Cabinet intended to increase cooperation with Westinghouse for the supply of nuclear fuel. Prime Minister Yatsenyuk said:

We leave the project, which now has โ€œEnergoatomโ€ and significantly expand our cooperation on the acquisition of nuclear fuel for Ukrainian nuclear power plants of the company Westinghouse what is signed and will sign the appropriate agreement.

Source: Ibid โ€œRussia signed a contract with Ukraine for the supply of nuclear fuel for 2015โ€, (RU)

NOVEMBER 27, 2014 - ZAPORHYZNE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT BLOWUPS:

ZAPORHYZNE nuclear-plant-ukraine, Map of Nuke Plants Ukraine

FIG. 25: ZAPORHYZNE - LARGEST NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN EUROPE: ย  ย  ย  ย  ย (L) Zaporhyzne NPP is so large that it produces 70% of all the electricity from nuclear power plants in Ukraine. (R) One of four Soviet-era nuclear power plants in Ukraine, it is located in the SE corner north of Crimea. ย ย Source: Image โ€“ โ€œAccident at largest nuclear power plant in Europe revealed by Ukraine PMโ€, RT, Dec. 3, 2014. http://rt.com/news/211047-nuclear-plant-accident-ukraine/ ; MAP: โ€œNuclear power in Ukraineโ€. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_Ukraineย 

Two large explosions occurred late at night in a reactor at the Zaporhyzne Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) on Nov. 27. The power plant is in southeastern Ukraine, not far from the Novorussia war zone. Indications were from media reports, later confirmed by Russian scientists, radiation monitor data, and the leaked transcript below, that the releases approached a Chernobyl level nuclear eventย [FIG. 26]. Evidence from government radiation monitors in Latvia and Sweden exposed that data manipulation at government monitoring stations was widespread, and that radiation levels were under reported. The political coverup of the Chernobyl disaster, by the European countries most heavily invested in nuclear technologies, was similar. However monitors indicated that large releases traveled quickly throughout regions of Europe and into Scandinavia [FIG. 26]. The highest levels reported were detected for at least three days and nights in Greece, from Nov. 28 to Dec. 3, when data reporting ended.

NOVEMBER 28, 2014 - ZAPORHYZNE LEAKED ACCIDENT CONVERSATION:

The following conversation during the Zaporozhnye incident is between Tyshenko (General Director of Nuclear Power Plant) and Torbayevsky (Head of Emergency Readiness).

November 28, 2014:

8:12 PM: Tyshenko - Vasili what the hell is going on over there?

8:24 PM: Tyshenko - Why arenโ€™t you answering?

8:58 PM: Torbayevsky- Vacheslav Alexaivich, forgive me I didnโ€™t answer. We have an emergency. The Third Unit shut down. I am already there. Ignatchencho is with me. Krasnogorov is coming.

Tyshenko - Fuck! Why the hell didnโ€™t you tell me immediately? Do you understand the danger this will mean for us? We will be thrown in prison, you as well. Leaving now, will be there in 1 hour.

Torbayevsky - Need to contact Chech specialists from Skoda. Its their equipment.


November 29:

Tyshenko and Krasnogorov conversation - Krasnogorov (Head Engineer at plant ZGD).

Krasnagorov - Things Vacheslav Alexaivich are not good. The casket on the upper unit is not able to take the pressure. Seems we screwed around with this improper material long enough.

Tyshenko - Donโ€™t whine. You need to understand that no one asked me about any of it.

Krasnagorov - Even back then I was saying that this is not going to end well. We needed to do testing first. Its not just the caskets that are the problem. Its with the fuel as well.

Tyshenko - I said donโ€™t whine! The orders the ministry gave me I am doing. They warmed their hands on it already (they made their money) and let this fuck them now (let them deal with the fallout).

Krasnagorov - Understood.


December 2nd

7:48 AM Tyshenko and Stefansky (Assistant Plant manager)

Stefansky- Vacheslav Alexaivich as soon as you left, journalists flooded us. They are hanging out at the security checkpoint. What do I say to them?

8:01 AM Tyshenko - Listen, I fucking barely stand on my feet (tired). You yourself canโ€™t come up with something? Say that it is an electrical short circuit or some other shit like that, but about the reactor not a word! Blab- I will turn you inside out (skin you)! Thats it, out, Iโ€™m getting a few hours sleep and will be back.


December 2nd

8:53 AM Tyshenko and Torbayevsky

Torbayevsky - Vacheslav Alexaivich- We have a leak.

Tyshenko - Fuck! Where are you?

Torbayevsky - Iโ€™m at the station with the personnel, trying to fix it, but its a dead number (no use).

9:31 AM Tyshenko - Ok, I called to the top. We need to be quiet now or weโ€™ll go to Donbass as volunteers; Do You understand?

Torbayevsky - Understood.

12:17 PM Tyshenko - Vasili, I was called to Kiev immediately. Figure this out without me.

Torbayevsky - What do we do with personnel? We need to evacuate people, radiation is off the charts! And locals need to be warned. We already started dumping into the water supply from the cooling system. Very soon we will have a second Chernobyl.

Tyshenko - Donโ€™t start panic! We were told to be quiet. Weโ€™ll be quiet!

Torbayevsky - Vacheslav Alexaivich! Do you understand we can no longer keep silent? This is a catastrophe! Here in a 100 kilometer radius, nothing will be left alive! Fucking sky is already glowing! (inside joke about radiation)

Tyshenko - Listen! I am flying to Kiev. Wait for a call. For now donโ€™t answer any questions and donโ€™t talk to anyone.

Source: G. Eliason, โ€œHas the Largest Nuclear Plant In Europe-Located In Ukraine-Suffered a Major Accident?โ€, ย WashingtonsBlog.com, December 31, 2014. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/ย 


UKRAINE - 1986 CHERNOBYL REPEATS


RADIATION MONITOR READINGS IN EUROPE - NOV. 27-DEC. 3, 2014:


RADIATION MONITOR READINGS IN EUROPE - NOV. 27-DEC. 3, 2014

FIG. 26: RADIATION LEVELS FOR LATVIA, SWEDEN, AND GREECE NOV. 27-DEC. 3, 2014.ย Monitoring stations close to sea level in Baldone and Jelgava, Latvia, were the first to detect radiation early on Nov. 28, about 24 hours after the blowups at Zaporhyzne the night before. After both monitors peaked at about 590 nSv/hr on Nov. 28, the monitors were turned off. The other 4 locations in Latvia and Sweden registered no change in radiation levels, but had data gaps where the data had been removed. On the Salaspils and Jurmala graphs it appeared that the data gaps had been crudely filled in. Scattered data points on the Jurmala graph, peaked on Nov. 29 at 200 nSv/hr, but were contradicted in the same graph by a flat line that showed no change in rad levels from Nov. 27-Dec. 2. Peak rad levels reflect the highest exposure danger, and are the most significant data for determining exposure risks. Despite obvious data manipulation, spiking (Feb. 27-28) observed on multiple monitors in Latvia, Sweden, and Greece, indicates โ€œmonitor malfunctionโ€ can be ruled out. ย Source: European Radiological Data Exchange Platform, European Commission. ย https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2014/12/03/whats-up-with-nov-28-2014-radiation-spike-in-lativia-eurdep-shows-peak-of-600nsvhr-0-6%C2%B5svhr-highly-unusual-for-sea-level-additional-data-suggests-possible-cover-up-of-radiolo/

Image #27 SERRAI, Greece rad reads w page.

FIG. 27: RADIATION READINGS AT SERRAL, GREECE (NOV. 27-DEC. 3, 2014). ย Monitors indicate that radioactive releases from Zaporhyzne NPP traveled throughout parts of Europe, with the highest concentrations (Dec. 2: 90,000,000 nSv/hr) detected in Greece on Nov. 30 and Dec. 2. The extremely high levels reported in Greece were 141,000X higher than Jelgava, Latvia, on Nov. 28. Radiation in Greece was first reported on November 30, and could have been the reason for data gaps (as well as missing data at Serral), and monitor shut downs, in Latvia and Sweden Nov. 29 and Dec. 2. Greece and Sweden did not turn off their rad monitors, but Latvia (a strong member of NATO) shut down all of theirs by Dec. 2. ย ย Source: European Radiological Data Exchange Platform, European Commission. ย https://allegedlyapparent.wordpress.com/2014/12/03/whats-up-with-nov-28-2014-radiation-spike-in-lativia-eurdep-shows-peak-of-600nsvhr-0-6%C2%B5svhr-highly-unusual-for-sea-level-additional-data-suggests-possible-cover-up-of-radiolo/

The radiation levels reported in the atmosphere at Serral, Greece, were very high (over 80,000,000 nSv/hr on Nov. 30 when first detected) and remained high on Dec. 3 (60,000,000 nSv/hr), the last day recorded on the graph. There is an obvious data gap on the graph before and after the reported data for Nov. 30-Dec. 3. The big question is why were radiation levels consistently high for a minimum of three days and nights at Serral, since radiation is carried by air currents from the point source and tend to spike. The pattern of the Serral radiation data indicated the nuclear event was protracted and continued for more than several days at the Zaporhyzne NPP. And the leaked transcript of events inside the plant confirms that by Dec. 2, the nuclear event had not even been resolved and was still releasing radiation into the atmosphere. This explains why all the monitors in Latvia were turned off on Dec. 2 in order to hide radiation releases from a runaway disaster at Zaporhyzne.

EVIDENCE FROM LEAKED TRANSCRIPT OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM: There are admissions in the leaked transcript for Dec. 2, made by Torbayevsky, the Head of Emergency Readiness, that Unit 3 shut down and that there was a leak that Torbayevsky had not been able to fix, โ€œIโ€™m at the station with the personnel, trying to fix it, but its a dead number (no use).โ€

On Nov. 29, Krasnagorov (Head Engineer at plant ZGD). told Tyshenko (General Director of Nuclear Power Plant), โ€œThings Vacheslav Alexaivich are not good. The casket on the upper unit is not able to take the pressure. Seems we screwed around with this improper material long enough.โ€ This is not the only indication that MOX fuel was already introduced to reactors in Ukraine. If it was MOX fuel in Unit 3, the cause of the Fukushima disaster, it was not even tested first at Zaporhyzne NPP. The admission by Krasnagorov to Tyshenko on Nov. 29 is even worse: โ€œEven back then I was saying that this is not going to end well. We needed to do testing first. Itโ€™s not just the caskets that are the problem. Itโ€™s with the fuel as well.โ€ Along with the announcement of a 119 day shutdown in reactor 3, another oblique reference to โ€œupgraded Westinghouse fuel [ed. MOX]โ€ appeared in the news on Dec. 6: โ€œDuring the outage, the third unit will be downloading the upgraded fuel assemblies manufactured by Westinghouse (FA-WR) [ed. FuelAssembliesโ€“WestinghouseResearch].โ€

By Dec. 2, Torbayevsky as Head of Emergency Readiness, urged Tyshenko that it was time to evacuate: โ€œWhat do we do with personnel? We need to evacuate people, radiation is off the charts! And locals need to be warned. We already started dumping into the water supply from the cooling system. Very soon we will have a second Chernobyl. โ€Torbayevsky continued and indicated how serious the event was 5 days after it had started. Here in a 100 kilometer radius, nothing will be left alive!: โ€œVacheslav Alexaivich! Do you understand we can no longer keep silent? This is a catastrophe! Fucking sky is already glowing! (inside joke about radiation).โ€

On Dec. 2, Tyshenko also reveals that decisions were made at the Ministry based on Westinghouse bribes, and he simply followed orders: โ€œI said donโ€™t whine! The orders the ministry gave me I am doing. They warmed their hands on it already (they made their money) and let this fuck them now (let them deal with the fallout).โ€ This was the same complaint in Japan made by upper management and politicians when opposing the nuclear industry. One Japanese official said that they continue to increase the bribe until it is futile to resist any more.

NUCLEAR INDUSTRY MODUS OPERANDI: The details on the Zaporhyzne nuclear event on November 27, follows the Fukushima template for disaster exposing manipulations by the nuclear industry at all levels of government and business anywhere in the world. Westinghouse and GE are both secretly owned by the Rockefellers whose nuclear reactor designs are used in 85% of the commercial reactors around the world. Westinghouse has bribed Ukraine politicians and government officials to make the same mistakes that were made in Japan in the decision making process that led to the Fukushima disaster.

page 51 kissinger_

And another Rockefeller link to the separatist war in eastern Ukraine is the Minsk Agreement. Henry Kissinger wrote the flawed Minsk Agreement.


Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be usedย as pawns in foreign policy.


Henry Kissinger

SEE: C. Fitzpatrick, โ€œFormer Russian Intelligence Officers Behind Boisto โ€œTrack IIโ€ Talks โ€“ and Now the Flawed Minsk Agreementโ€, interpretermag.com, Feb 12, 2015. http://www.interpretermag.com/ former-russian-intelligence-officers-behind-boisto-track-ii-talks-and-now-the-flawed-minsk-agreement/ย 

U. Friedman,โ€œA 24-Step Plan to Resolve the Ukraine Crisis Meeting in Finland, a group of Americans and Russians develops an agenda for peaceโ€, TheAtlantic.com, Aug. 26, 2014. http://www.theatlantic.com /international/archive/2014/08/a-24-step-plan-to-resolve-the-ukraine-crisis/379121/

DEC. 3, 2014 - FIRST DAY OF P.M. YATSENYUKโ€™S NEW CABINET:ย VERKHOVNA RADA REPORT ON ZAPORHYZNE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

Image #28 Yatsenyuk in Parliament

FIG. 28: ZAPORHYZNE ACCIDENT REPORT TO VERKHOVNA RADA DEC. 3, 2014: ย (L) Prime Minister Yatsanyuk and (R) Minister of Internal Affairs Arsen Avakov listen to the official report presented to the Verkhovna Rada (Supreme Council) on the Zaporhyzne NPP explosions in reactor 3, on Nov. 27, 2914.


DEC. 6, 2014 - WESTINGHOUSE LETTER ON UNIT 3 โ€˜UPGRADEDโ€™ FUEL TEST:

p.50 PIC- Westinghouse-letter-for-pub

TO: Corporate Headquarters, Westinghouse Electric Corporation cc Westinghouse Customer Service, 29 Stanwix Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222

FROM: Representative of innovation technologies of Westinghouse Electric Corporation in Ukraine

DATE: December 6, 2014

SUBJECT: The Seventh Experimental batch of nuclear power reactor fuel assemblies

I report to you itโ€™s impossible to get deformation of ware beyond the given limits during the past testing of the seventh experimental batch of nuclear power reactor fuel assemblies. After launching of the third reactor [ed. reactor #3] on object No.1 ninety per cent of loaded NPRFA were deformed not on given parameters. As a result it was impossible to get them by standard methods and means from reactor. Experimental models taken after deformation of NPRFA were sent to the central office in final order.

[Signed] Adam R. Taheja ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย (Time stamped Dec. 7, 2014)

Representative of innovation technologies of Westinghouse Electric Corporation in Ukraine.

Source: LETTER: โ€œCatastrophe at Ukraineโ€™s Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant?โ€, G. Eliason, Jan. 3, 2015. http://www.globalresearch.ca/catastrophe-at-ukraines-zaporozhye-nuclear-power-plant/5422212ย 


DECEMBER 6, 2014, UNIT 3 DAMAGED MOX FUEL ASSEMBLIES DOWNLOADED: Unit 3 South-Ukrainian NPP December 6, scheduled to be shut down for an average of turnarounds (CPD) for a duration of 119 days. This was reported in the press center of the NNEGC โ€œEnergoatomโ€. During the outage, the third unit will be downloading the upgraded fuel assemblies manufactured by Westinghouse (FA-WR). Download Westinghouse fuel in unit 3 NPP approval by the State nuclear regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine. ย  https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2014/12/07/those-westinghouse-rods-wont-even-fit-properly-theyre-square-vs-hexagonal/ย 


DECEMBER 28, 2014 - SECOND NUCLEAR ACCIDENT AT ZAPORHYZE:ย On December 28, 2014, two days prior to Yatsenyuk signing the contract with Westinghouse, the media reported the odd coincidence of a 2nd emergency shutdown at Ukraineโ€™s Zaporozhye NPP. It was officially reported as a non-nuclear incident, a โ€œshort circuit in a transformerโ€, rather than as an accident indicating a radiation problem. However skeptics in the nuclear industry believed it was disinformation. Ukrainian nuclear scientists were soon exposed for misleading the public, when reports of a radiation spike indicating a radiation leak were detected in Crimea, 140 km away from the Zaporozhnye NPP. Ukraineโ€™s emergency services claimed that levels of radiation were 16.3 times the legal limit. People who lived around the plant who had left the area reported that iodine tablets were given to residents around the plant. A second reactor (#6) had already been shut down, and despite official statements that it was operational, it was still down on December 29, 2014. ย ย 

SEE: G. Eliason, โ€œHas the Largest Nuclear Plant In Europe-Located In Ukraine-Suffered a Major Accident?โ€, Washingtonsblog.com, Dec. 31, 2014.


ANOTHER UNEXPLAINED SHUTDOWN - SOUTH UKRAINE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT:ย At the same time a third reactor was shut down for 120 days at South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant, where Westinghouse fuel assemblies were being tested. A normal shutdown is 30-40 days, an indication that there must be serious problems at the plant, likely to be related to the Westinghouse fuel assemblies. By bribing politicians and officials, Westinghouse has sold fuel rods to Finland, Sweden, Ukraine, and other countries to use in Soviet era reactors. This has caused near explosions, and serious disasters that could have released Chernobyl level radiation. In Finland, the Russian engineer building a Soviet era power plant walked off the job when he learned that Finland had purchased fuel rods from Westinghouse to put in the reactors before the plant was finished. When Finnish nuclear engineers installed the Westinghouse rods in the new reactor, it nearly blew up in a Chernobyl level global disaster. Finland made the wise decision to abandon Westinghouse fuel in all cases.

Westinghouse is aware of the extreme dangers created by their fraudulent business practices, and of creating another Chernobyl, or with MOX fuel present at Fukushima, yet they continue bribing and selling their fuel rods to governments who take the bribes. Since reactor problems related to fuel assemblies have happened multiple times in Ukraine between November 27 and December 29, 2014, it has to be a deliberate attempt by Westinghouse to create another global scale nuclear disaster. Once again nuclear power is exposed as a far more lethal biological danger, as part of the global depopulation agenda, than nuclear weapons.


DEC. 30, 2014, YATSENYUK SIGNS WESTINGHOUSE CONTRACT IN BRUSSELS:ย During Yatstsenyukโ€™s final press conference on Dec. 30, 2014, the Prime Minister of Ukraine said:

In Brussels today signed an agreement with the company โ€œWestinghouseโ€ to increase the supply of nuclear fuel for Ukrainian nuclear power plants.

The text of the statement was published on the official website of the Russian Foreign Ministry to assure other customers that Russia is reliable, and to avoid culpability for blowups and disasters at Zaporhyzne NPP due to Westinghouse fuel. The Foreign Ministry said:

The Ukrainian authorities do not and cannot be reason for concern about the reliability of supply of nuclear fuel from Russia. State Corporation on atomic energy โ€œRosatomโ€ provides regular and uninterrupted supply of fuel assemblies for nuclear power plants of Ukraine.

Source: Dec 30, 2014ย The project โ€œChernobyl-2! to be! Bledso, Aftershock.su, Dec 30 2014, ย http://niqnaq.wordpress.com/page/2/ย 

Ukrainian company โ€œEnergoatomโ€ signed an agreement in Brussels on Tuesday [Dec 30], with the US company Westinghouse, on the supply of nuclear fuel for Ukrainian NPPs.

UKRAINE SCIENTISTS DISCOVER FUKUSHIMA IS A PULSING NEUTRON BOMB:

V.D. Rusov1โˆ—, V.A. Tarasov1, V.M. Vaschenko2, E.P. Linnik1, T.N. Zelentsova1, M.E. Beglaryan1, S.A. Chernegenko1, S.I. Kosenko1, P.A. Molchinikolov1, V.P. Smolyar1, E.V. Grechan1, โ€œFukushima Plutonium Effect and Blow-Up Regimes in Neutron- Multiplying Media,โ€ World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology (2013), p.9.

1Department of Theoretical and Experimental Nuclear Physics, Odessa National Polytechnic University, Odessa, Ukraine 2State Ecological Academy for Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine.

Following the Fukushima disaster, it is ironic that Ukrainian nuclear scientists wrote the first scientific paper on the neutron pulse phenomenon first discovered in a nuclear power plant. The recent article about their discovery of this new scientific phenomenon has put Fukushima in the scientific literature, โ€œFukushima Plutonium Effect and Blow-Up Regimes in Neutron-Multiplying Media,โ€ and reports that melting MOX fuel may lead to a neutron flux blow-up, but surprisingly there is scarce reference data in the scientific literature. Taking into consideration that many Russian scientists have expressed concern about the instability of the Kiev Junta, and the dangerous geopolitical climate the Junta has created, the scientists are now issuing warnings about pending nuclear disasters in Ukraine by the Kiev Junta. Although nuclear waste, nuclear processing facilities, and the situation at Chernobyl are concerns, fuel problems at nuclear power plants that result in pulsing neutron bombs that cannot be turned off should be the number one global concern. The world cannot afford another Fukushima, and it appears that a global Chernobyl level event occurred on Nov. 27, 2014, at the Zaporhyze NPP without disclosure or any warning to the public.

Of immediate concern, is the very dangerous association of Prime Minister Yatsenyuk with Westinghouse, and US interests and pressures. The Kiev Junta has openly declared nuclear war on Ukraine. With many nuclear power plants, and evidence that MOX fuel has already been introduced to power plants in Ukraine, anything can happen. A further warning, the poster session document below by Russian scientists, was presented at a CTBTO conference in June 2013, at the Hofburg Palace in Vienna, Austria.

Sergei A. Pakhomov, Yuri V. Dubasov, โ€œEstimation of Nuclear-Energy Excursion Possibility during Fukushima-1 NPP Accident,โ€ CTBTO: Science and Technology 2013, June 17-21, 2013, Hofburg Palace, Vienna, Austria. http://www.ctbto.org/fileadmin/snt2013/posters/T2-P22.pdf

It is sadly ironic that the global nuclear project came out of the Vienna School, beginning with basic research as early as 1900. The Vienna School has a very dark history, and is a critical component of Jesuit control over the Hapsburg Empire and the Vatican. The Jesuit control over humanity has increased slowly for the past 500 years and is now reaching their NWO goal of severe global depopulation through poisons, one world order, and complete submission of humanity to a state of willing slavery.

With nearly 500 nuclear power plants around the world, and the โ€˜successโ€™ of the โ€œFukushima experiment,โ€ that converted a nuclear power plant into an eternally pulsing neutron bomb, humanity and Ukraine are facing the greatest danger to life on this planet in the history of mankind.


page 55 endpiece Ukie graves

THIS ARTICLE IS DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF THE MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN, WHO HAVE DIED NEEDLESSLY IN DONBASS AS UNKNOWING VICTIMS OF US FOREIGN POLICY AND THE ANGLO-AMERICAN PERMANENT WAR CRIMES RACKETEERING SYNDICATE. SPECIAL THANKS AND RECOGNITION TO THE VOLUNTEER MILITIA OF DONBASS WHO HAVE FOUGHT FOR THEIR FAMILIES, THEIR LAND, AND THEIR FREEDOM SO THAT THEIR PEOPLE AND FUTURE GENERATIONS CAN LIVE.

Leuren Moret March 21, 2015

Castle Bravo schrunch


ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  Visitors to LM:GNC



Leuren Moret: Global Nuclear Coverup



# ย  # ย  #

โย โย โย LM:GNC Homeย โย โย โย Currentsย โย โย โย Wavesย โย โย โย Lifestyleย โย โย โย Archiveย โย โย โย Glossaryย โย โย โย Contactย โย โย โย ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย